I was at a standard micro brewery yesterday. 12 different IPAs on tap. One Kolsch. One Amber. One dark amber/porter. One oatmeal stout. Two ciders.

I had the Kolsch first (thank god people are making this amazing, highly drinkable and pleasant beer!), and then the amber.

But, by and large, American beers are a waste of time. Undrinkable pucker-inducing bitter swill.

Brewing has been around for centuries, and there's a reason people made pilsners and kolsch and dark beers; they were drinkable by anyone at any time. And there's a reason people make IPAs; they are the easiest and shortest time to brew, so you can churn out more of it in less time with less skill than any other brew. It's just economics with good marketing backing it up.

But it still tastes terrible.

Literally going into a meeting in 2 minutes to set my OKRs... despite the fact that I am an independent contributor, have no team, no direct reports, a manager in-name-only, and my schedule and workload is dictated by outside sources (customers issuing RFPs).

Every factor of the O, the K, and the R, are unmappable and unmeasurable for someone in my role/position.

But I've been doing it every quarter for seven years now.

Joy.

"She wanted to do them all along, she just now has the executive function to back up her plans."

That's the most loving thing to say. It's wonderful...!

Bad Bad Hats - "Detroit Basketball" is not actually about basketball, but it might be the most goddamn hooky infectious little ditty I've heard in a long time. Released in 2021, there's nothing COVID about this song. Just poppy fun. They are also the most casual band ever... release music kinda whenever they want to (over the last 9 years, maybe 20 songs?), and play local gigs, and are just so chill.

Ren - "Hi Ren" fuck everything you think you know about popular music and storytelling and long songs... Ren is an interesting character who has spent more than a decade sick with chronic illnesses and mental issues. During that time, he has persevered, and worked on the only thing that gave him any solace; music. His pieces are LONG - 9 to 13 minute songs - with multiple movements and sections, and extensive storylines that are poignant and often (like "Hi Ren") autobiographical. An absolute stunner, but also an emotional journey. You listen to these songs like you listen to jazz or classical music; pay deep attention.

Ren = "The Tale of Jenny and Screech" is a 13-minute opus that is absolutely worth the full journey. Not gonna say any more about that. Just listen. To the WHOLE thing.

Ren also plays/busks with a full band called The Big Push, and their take on Black Sabbath's "War Pigs" is astonishing, and integrates probably a dozen fantastic hard rock songs into a single seamless funky jam! Live. On the street. Brilliant.

Heh. I'm in Seattle, quite near KB.

The work these people do is amazing.

I hear ya, but this is not falsifiable data. Yeah, a scammer gets ahold of the digital hash that represents my Blood ID (or whatever) from a poorly secured database, but I'm the only one that has the ACTUAL BLOOD. So I can always confirm my identity with absolute certainty in case of theft or impersonation... a thief is only going to have the computer hash, not my actual blood. (Or retinal scan, or whatever bio data is being used to establish my identity.)

Of course, some people donate blood or sperm or organs or whatever, and there could be an issue with security there. But that's not a concern for 99% of the population, while shitty passwords are literally a problem for everyone in the world.

Biometric data is just another identifier, like a SSN, driver's license, name, whatever. Because it is harder to gather right now does not make it any different than any other identification method. All the same security concerns apply.

Regardless of whether the imposter has my social security number or the digital hash of my blood's fingerprint, it's just data. And that data can be validated or invalidated through more stringent testing methods; like running another blood test and validating I am who I say I am. No scammer has access to my blood, so I'll always be able to prove I am me.

"You know what's cool about credentials? They can be revoked. You know what sucks about biometrics? They can't."

Ah. Right. That flipped the light on for me...

Thanks, as always, for the education.

I could see my heath care provider having a validated sample of my biometric data, and being able to validate my corporeal self to an entity that needed to confirm my identity vs an imposter. The imposter wouldn't have access to my blood, or whatever, so validating should be possible.

I still haven't figured out how to transfer my measly ETH holdings from Gemini to MetaMask.

I should do that...

Been chatting with KB about Marjorie Taylor Greene being appointed to the Homeland Security Committee in the House of Representatives, and ... I'm gonna need to make some popcorn ... this is gonna be good ...

Ms. QAnon is now going to be witness to the sausage-making that is National Security... at least through the perspective of the utterly ineffective clown car that is the Dept of Homeland Security! Her worldview is so simplistic and so shallow, she has no idea how data is gathered, how risks are evaluated, or how decisions finally get made and then turned into policy. Here's the fun part: IT'S BORING. And SLOW. She's gonna have a conniption (again) and it's going to be lovely to watch.

And/Or, she's going to absolutely dig it. I mean, she's gone DEEP down the QAnon rabbithole, done oodles of research and totally believes that shit. Sorting through hours and hours of difficult to understand coded messaging to come up with "an answer" that she's totally confident of.

Which honestly could serve her very well when digging into issues of national security.

Fortunately, she's just one idiot on a temporary (2-year) committee assignment with 30 other people in the room, so I could see her just disappearing down this rabbit hole and completely eliminating herself from any meaningful work at all. Plus, anything the Committee comes up with has to be voted on in the House, then voted on in the Senate, then signed by Biden. So ... yeah, she's gonna be sidelined.

And then we all win! :-)

Either way, it's time to invest in popcorn for sure...

"...there is a societally norming effect of people consuming and valuing similar media, and the lack of exposure to such creates distance/tension."

Only if you want to be a part of that social group. To be a member of any social group, you need to partake of that group's social activities and cultural heritage. Choosing not to see hugely popular films is not the wrong decision, but then you don't get to complain about how the social group you want to associate with has cultural touchstones you refuse to engage with. That's your choice.

These films are fun and clever, and have withstood the test of time. That right there makes them a valuable key to the baseline experiences of a certain social group; they have this shared experience, and it holds up and is still enjoyable decades later.

I also am resistant to some aspects of popular culture - especially movies - and have never seen Goonies or Titanic or Twilight or any Avengers film, to name a few.

So I understand the desire to avoid falling to crass consumerism, and the pablum that is today's superhero movie franchises.

But I also know that will leave me out of some conversations. I won't get some memes. I have no idea who Thanos is, or what the stones he wants, can do.

"...that just leaves me feeling cold and isolated because it doesn't evoke anything in me while meaning so much to most everyone else."

Ok. So what? That's your choice. Enjoy it. Or don't. It's yours to do with as you please.

I feel this parallels with things like disease research; there's a shitload of money available for anyone that can insert the word "cancer" into their disease research, but very little for someone researching Bell's Palsy, or other less-well-known diseases.

The business drives which research pays the best. And academics need to buy Ramen noodles, too, so they go where the funding is. Chicken or egg?

Ah yes! I saw his signing, and was wondering how he came up on the radar for our coach (Alan Clarke, "Clarkie").

I'm always curious about how new talent is discovered. Our #8, Riekert Hattingh, was a Blue Bull (and his father a Springbok), so we had a bunch of Saffa talent on our squad for a few years there.

Look at Kevin McCarthy's Republican House as a bunch of beta-testers.

I love this. And get it. Deeply.

I've worked extensively in VC, but back in the late 90's and 2000's, when there were a few people with specific interests and lots of money, who helped clever people develop ideas in certain areas.

Venture Capital firms were focused on certain issues, and didn't fund just any ole project that came across the transom with a hockey stick projected adoption curve. They'd say, "Great idea, but not my area of investment interest. Go talk to XYZ. They are interested in that area."

But a couple of big visible successes brought every swinging dick into the VC market, and then shit got dicey. VCs stopped asking pointy questions because there was a feeding frenzy and they had to move fast if they wanted to get in on the profitable financing rounds.

I was in meetings where the VCs in the room didn't really like the idea, but they liked the person presenting the idea so they invested to get in on their good side, and get first crack at their NEXT idea. Seriously. "Sure, we'll give you $5m for this initial round of financing on that pet app, but let us know what else you are working on - even at the conceptual stages - because we think you have a bright future ahead of you."

AND, it created a shitty feedback loop. Goober develops an app, sells it for $150m, and it tanks, but Goober now has $150m that HE is going to invest.... despite not ever developing a working/quality product, or understanding anything about how to grow a company.

Y Combinator now has a dozen of these dipshits on their investment staff, and I guarantee every other tech investment house has the same types of people on their staff.

There is so much money available out there today, it is ridiculous. But there are very few companies I'd accept an investment from, specifically for this reason.

Not picking sides... gonna wear our Seawolves kit, to show local pride while we are there. We are hoping it is warm enough to wear these silly Seawolves hawaiian shirts while we are at the game: https://shop.seawolves.rugby/products/2023-paladin-hawaiian-shirt

"That's it, the rest is as little/as much as she wants to share. Which surprised her, in a good way."

This is honestly the first time in this saga I've felt there was anything healthy going on here, for either of you. And this is wonderful! Keep communicating your needs, and understanding her needs, and ... what more does one need? That's a good foundation, right there.

Minor correction: Daylight Savings Time ends at the end of this year. It was simply postponed for 18 months when the air and rail carriers complained that they already had their schedules booked 12 months out, and needed more time for the transition to take place. 2024 won't have DST.

Anyway, to the meat of your comments, I - as always - appreciate the context and framing and calming down you do.

However you have also argued both sides of my concern: that it isn't a problem because the Republicans are in disarray, and that because the Republicans are in disarray and do not care about decorum or customs, a small rogue contingent can ABSOLUTELY make this happen just as I represented it.

The Senate? The President? They don't have any say over the House and its internal workings. The House often passes things or makes policies or committees that are blatantly wrong/illegal/ineffectual and everyone just shakes their head sadly and ignores their work.

The Speaker of the House is an internal position, voted on the House members present at the time of the vote. Period. Donezo.

Maybe appointing Mike Lindell as the Speaker of the House is dumb. Maybe people will take issue with it outside of the House.

But, as we all know, there is no enforcement mechanism in place except for custom; and the Republicans will throw that out without the slightest thought or regret.

So we are back to the Speaker of the House being appointed in some late-night shenanigans which will give the NPR constitutional scholars conniptions, but will stand because there simply isn't any mechanism in place to make it NOT happen.

I made my feelings clear, and asked for other people to weigh in on their feelings; not judge me or mine.

Woah... I knew her story felt oddly familiar. I'd completely forgotten about John Walker Lindh!

I read through that article - and a couple others - from Gary Brecher "the war nerd", and realized something I didn't know before: ISIS is just a buncha entitled middle-class dipshits from rich countries with great social programs. Bored teenagers who wanna play army man and think they know everything. And it makes me less sympathetic to her requests to return.

I'm no fan of the State Department. But the number of people affected by taking a hardline position against repatriation couldn't fill a jumbo jet.

Honestly, we have more important problems to face, than to spend more time worrying about her and the bad decisions she's made.

But so much of the US's defense posture is predicting how things may go in the future, and - if her wishes to return are scorned by the US - then she is ripe for someone else to scoop her up and use her for their anti-US propaganda.

So do we take her back and help her reform to prevent her use by our enemies?

Or is she already an enemy that we have no place for?

Everybody is missing the core point here, that is utterly terrifying.

The Motion to Vacate - At ANY time ANY member of the House can Move to Vacate. A vote is taken, and if the majority vote Yay, then the speaker loses their position, and a new speaker is elected.

How many votes does it take to make someone the speaker? From Reuters: "A candidate must gain a majority of votes cast. With 435 seats in the chamber, the speaker must get 218 votes to win. If no candidate reaches that threshold, the House will continue voting until someone does."

There are very few people actually sitting in the House of Representatives when any vote on any measure is taken. It could be 30 people in the entire building. This happens often with the minority party: they are powerless to do anything about the vote, so they often sit them out and spend their time on other meetings, committees, negotiations, whatever. Not every member of the House is present. Not every member of the House votes on every bill or motion.

So all that needs to happen, is 5 Republicans sneak into the House at 3:AM, have a vote to Move to Vacate McCarthy from the Speakership, and then vote again for WHOEVER THEY WANT. Trump. DeSantis. Marilyn Manson. Mike Lindell. LITERALLY ANY AMERICAN can be the Speaker of the House.

Now, there is one failsafe... and that is that McCarthy is responsible for the agenda and scheduling the sessions. So theoretically, every member of the House gets a calendar of upcoming bills and votes, and when they are scheduled to hit the floor.

BUT THOSE SCHEDULES GET CHANGED. Sometimes on the fly. Sometimes they run long, and House members just leave to go take care of other business.

All the Republicans have to do now is wait for one of these long and boring sessions, and once everyone leave for dinner or bed or whatever and they have the balance right in the House, ANY member can stand up and ask for the floor, then present the Move to Vacate, which is voted on immediately with whoever is left on the House floor.

We could literally wake up tomorrow morning with Mike Lindell as the Speaker of the House and be completely powerless to do ANYTHING about it.

That's fucking terrifying. And there is no defense against it. Democrats can't have 200 people sitting in the House, or within 5 minutes of the House floor, 24/7/365... so it is only a matter of time before this action is taken and something truly insane happens to the House.

I used to like Y Combinator.

But now it's just a flag for stupid techbro shortsighted ideas.

I got worried about my drinking at one point, and stopped cold turkey for a year. It wasn't difficult at all, so I went back to drinking normally.

The other night I was out to dinner with friends, and realized four of the stories I told had drinking as an important element in them.

But nowadays, that's because I haven't really grokked that my tolerance for alcohol is not what it once was, and four (high ABV) beers can black me out. At a friend's memorial service at a micro brewery, I made agreements to do several things, that I didn't recall the next day.

I think I need to stick to my single malt whisky, and not do the beer thing. I have no idea what my beer tolerance is anymore... I stopped drinking it entirely when I did keto 6 years ago, and I think it just hits me different now.

You are a good person with a good heart and empathy for others. Alcohol seems to have impeded your natural personality at key moments. I hope this year is more gentle to you, and gives you time to find your center and stability again. Hugs...

Oh good lord I am old.

Hey yall, I'm kinda back. Took vacation from December 15th to January 2nd, and today is my first day back at work (which is where I read Hubski).

Pretty successful hermit-ing for a couple of weeks, with the exceptions of Xmas with the family, NYE with one other couple, and a memorial for a friend who passed.

It was perfect.

I am transforming from the social butterfly I was, back into a caterpillar.

On Writing is a surprising book. I look forward to discussing it when you finish.