POST TIME ~1900 UTC 20150815
Ruleset 2: WEIRD-QUORUM
Terms defined:
ruleset number as N in form: N.m.o
rule number as m in form: N.m.o
subrule as required as o in form: N.m.o
ruleset proposition: unratified ruleset
ratified ruleset: ruleset already approved
immutable and mutable rules: as stated on the Wikipedia page about nomic games
player: human user of Hubski subscribed to #hubnomic
vote: statement of support for the ratification of a ruleset proposition
shall: must, required, mandatory
parent post, child comment.
2.1 all new ruleset propositions shall be created under the parent post of the existing ratified ruleset (eg Hubnomic 2 development should exist under Hubnomic 1 to reduce post spamming)2.2 all new ruleset propositions shall be incremented plus one from the parent post (eg all ruleset propositions on this post should start with 2)
2.3 ratification of ruleset propositions shall occur 24 hours after the post of the next ruleset under the following conditions:
2.3.1 voting shall occur on a specific version of a ruleset proposition, i.e. changes may be discussed but players should not vote for a child comment containing a ruleset proposition unless they agree with it in its current form
2.3.2 changes to a player's ruleset proposition shall be at the discretion of the player proposing the proposition
2.3.3 changes to a player's ruleset proposition can be made at any point but votes shall count for the ruleset which is quoted in a vote
2.4 votes shall contain the word "Ratify" under a quote of the version of the ruleset proposition they wish to ratify
2.5 ruleset propositions shall contain a unique identifying term at the top which shall change if the proposition changes to make vote counting easy (i.e. ADJECTIVE-NOUN)
2.6 at the end of the 96 hour period marked by the post time posted in ratified rulesets, the ruleset proposition contained in a child comment with the most votes counted using the above method shall be ratified
2.7 ratification shall occur when the next post by entity hubnomic is created in #hubnomic with an incremented ruleset number.
2.8 terms used in rulesets and ruleset propositions shall be defined in the post unless the term already exists.
2.9 edits shall be detailed below the post
RATIFIED AND EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY
CHANGE HAS BEEN MADE TO RATIFICATION RATE: NOW 24 HOURS. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO CHANGE THIS TIME ONCE AGAIN, PLEASE DO SO IN A RULESET PROPOSITION.
Ruleset Proposition 3: PHILOSOPHICAL-SURFACE 3.1 A win condition shall exist. 3.1.1 This win condition shall be defined in a future ruleset. 3.2 Upon (at least) one player achieving said win condition, this player(s) will be awarded one point. 3.2.1 Following any player receiving a point, the rules will revert to Ruleset 2: WEIRD-QUORUM ---------------------------------------- Edits will appear below this line. 3.2.1 Following any player receiving a point, the rules will revert to Ruleset Proposition 3: PHILOSOPHICAL-SURFACE 3.2.2 An up-to-date scoreboard of players with at least one point shall be maintained in the top level post.
Ruleset Proposition 2: WEIRD-QUORUM - META Do we all have to to use the exact format specified by Ruleset 2: WEIRD-QUORUM in our comments (ones other than "ratify" and related)? Meaning, if there's a proposition ruleset, and I want to reply with thoughts on why it might be difficult to implement, or have related thoughts, is that disallowed? I can understand if so. Also, does the game begin now, and if so, will it be one of these scenarios: 1) people replying with proposed modifications to the rules you posted or 2) people replying with out of left field other types of proposals? END META note: I have formatted this comment in accordance with my Ruleset Proposition 3: META-COMMENT
Ruleset Proposition 3: META-COMMENT Terms defined: 'Comment' is referring to the method by which HUBNOMIC is played, using Hubski's commenting system. 3.1 Players shall be allowed to post "META" comments. They shall do so via the following format: (the person writes their Question or Thought) END META'Question' or 'Thought' when used with the META tag is a scenario in which, in a comment, the player is not proposing a ruleset, ratifying nor voting, and is instead asking questions &/or giving feedback.
Proposition (number): RULESET-NAME - META