More interesting than that, I think, is the preface to it all. It's interesting that the men who wrote this report favor a Republican Congress over a Democratic one. If it's true that Democrats are looking to absorb OWS, I wonder how they will react. Will they take it as a threat or an opportunity? Embracing such a move would likely dilute the potency of the movement. It would also give ammunition to the American Bankers Association's attempt to identify "backers and funders, extremist leaders, policy positions, and rhetoric" which they can paint as enemies, manipulators and conspirators. On some level it is reassuring to know that they find OWS to be "an organized competitor who is very nimble and capable" of posing a real threat. But I'm not too confident that they will be able to weather the ensuing shitstorm of the 2012 election cycle, if they make it that far. Also: does anyone else know why this note is dated from the future?
> construct negative narratives of OWS for high-impact media placement > a state- and district-specific [advertising] placement plan (including all mediums) based on political targeting > message testing, ... and targeted social media monitoring
Our opposition research work at this stage will produce an analysis of OWS backers and funders, extremist leaders, policy positions, and rhetoric for the development of strategic polling and messaging. The research will also identify opportunities to construct fact-based negative narratives of the OWS for high impact media placement to expose backers behind this movement. This is what fuels the news these days. Narratives. It's all messaging and marketing. It's all they know. It's no mistake that OWS isn't keen on message. It's more difficult for these groups if you don't play their game.