a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by kleinbl00

Because the minute you make people care more about scoring than sharing you get /r/Centuryclub attitudes.

Reddit didn't truly start to go downhill until karmawhores.net went live. And, as Hubski's API isn't public, there's no reason that data needs to ever come out.



syncretic  ·  4324 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Although I would be very disappointed if there isn't a public api for hubski at some point in the future, you don't need a public api to keep track of the top, say, 20 users on the site. I find that interesting, and since I follow most of those users anyway, when that list was removed from the community tab, I simply made a little text file in notepad that I manually update once a week or so. Perhaps it won't be a third party website, perhaps it will be a greasemonkey extension similar to RES. People love analyzing data, and just because you try to hide it from them doesn't mean they aren't going to find it anyway.

I'm surprised you're making the censorship argument, actually. You want to remove something from everyone because... why, exactly? Discourage people from treating the followers list like karma? How is that relevant at all? If you think someone is doing that, ignore them. mk originally removed tags because he didn't want them to turn into subreddits. He brought them back because... they won't. I wish mk would bring back the list of popular users, too, if only so I wouldn't have to waste a few moments of my time doing it manually. Hubski is fundamentally different from reddit. Followers won't turn into karma, you can't "cheat" followers, there is no hivemind here to cater to, you either submit things people like and gain followers, or you don't.

I think we should be adding features, not taking them away. If someone doesn't like a feature, they can ignore it. Plan and simple.

---
kleinbl00  ·  4324 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Arguing that certain data is corrosive is NOT censorship. The fact that you put it in those terms illustrates how pointless this discussion is.

---
syncretic  ·  4324 days ago  ·  link  ·  

    The fact that you put it in those terms illustrates how pointless this discussion is.

Why do you even bother replying to my comments if you're going to insult me every damn time? Wait, I don't give a shit. Thanks for reminding me why I ignored you in the first place. You can call it "corrosive data" all you want, taking something that was once available to the public and hiding it, removing it, that is censorship.

Don't bother replying, I muted you.

---