Let's think about this: If there is a God worthy of the Name, clearly that God must know the creature and the creature's mindset. Those of us who do good would do so regardless of any "guidance". (Do you really think we need biblical productions to understand that for example "thou shall not steal?") And as it has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt, regardless of the book, or messenger, or people or era involved, guidance does not help those who in fact do kill, steal, and cheat. So, that is not what 'Guidance' is about.
I'll concede this to be a worthy interpretation, but one too rare. :) And don't get me wrong; although I might find basis for that argument, I wouldn't make it. -That's why I didn't find Dawkin's The God Delusion to be personally interesting. I will strongly defend a right to equal footing for the uninformed, but no more. I also use 'uninformed' in a non-cynical way. I find myself to be insufficiently informed. That is my state, and the footing of my purpose.