How exactly is she enforcing anything via a case that hasn't even been heard yet, much less ruled upon?
https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/amy-coney-barret-casts-deciding-vote-to-block-limit-on-religious-gatherings-20201126-p56ibv.html This is how. Christianity exists to spread disease and naught else.
People said the same thing about Roberts and Gorsuch too. You really need to climb off your high horse. Or did you forget your using a full-on slur regarding your straw religious people in a private message to me recently?
Funny, they'd probably say the same thing about a gay person. But that's ok because you're doing it for a good reason, right?
So your defense is that you're being a bigot, but it's okay, because you're not as bigoted as some of the people you're bigoted towards?
Why was this Supreme Court Justice slammed through the senate while RBG's corpse was still cooling on the slab? Because HER BELIEFS AND RULINGS ARE ALREADY KNOWN. Yurtle the satanic turtle doesn't leave things as important as theocracy up to chance and opinion.
I thought I knew exactly how John Roberts would rule on cases, but it turns out I didn’t. Hyperbole on either side of the political coin is hyperbole. Also, I know some Christians that are pretty amazing. They’re New Testament types. They actually try and follow the teachings of Christ. They’re more liberal than I am.