How do you go from this type of storytelling and season finale:
To this:
I could go on and on about how they betrayed the characters they spent so much time building. Sam sits on the council to elect the king and has seemingly no problem that Jon Snow, the man who has time and time again been at his side and is his best friend in the world is banished. He has nothing to say about this?
I thought the ending sucked.
Prove me wrong or commiserate.
Garbage writing to wrap it up. The show was interesting in part because of the character development and dialog. They removed that from the last few episodes. Varys became flat, Jon became a waffle, Cersei was put on the bench, Grey Worm was castrated completely, and Brienne was made to blubber about Jamie. Tyrion lost his wit and became the great explainer. Daenerys was never a very strong character to begin with, which was probably the weakest aspect of the whole series, and yet, her transformation was too quick to be believable. It was boring that Bran should be voted king, and hilarious that Sansa said no thanks and no one got to change their vote, however, it wasn't what actually happened that was the problem. The problem is that they betrayed the work that had been done and just got sloppy. The dragons were so wild that they could barely be controlled by Daenerys, but then one became philosophical upon her death, and destroyed a metaphor. Sam presented the history of the war to Tyrion, and for the purposes of a joke, informed him that he wasn't in it, which would be impossible, seeing as Tyrion killed his father, the guy that sat in the Iron Throne. Not worth the shitty joke. Arya rode out of the ruins on a pale horse with a look of vengeance, then to walk out without purpose. Grey Worm teleported. The whole modern beverage easter egg thing was probably a symptom of shit going downhill. The show did interesting things like the red wedding, Ned Stark's death, Cersei's shame walk, the fire bombing of the temple, and Hodor. The death of the night king and the ruin of King's Landing could have matched up if the writing wasn't shit.
As a writer, I find that when people don't like the way things happen they say that the "writing is bad." If they can give examples of what would have made the writing better, they have a legitimate beef. Seasons 1-6 allowed the characters choice. It gave them options to explore, consequences to endure and a number of paths to follow. Seasons 7-8 have been about the culmination of those choices. Varys, whose career has been about undermining the Baratheons, is suddenly faced with the fact that there's a better choice than the one he's backing. He has no choice. Jon, who has always put others before himself, has to put others before himself. He has no choice. Cersei, who has always put her own needs before others, ends up with no choice. Grey Worm finally does something for himself - he chooses vengeance over chain of command. Brienne became a knight, got the guy, had the guy leave her, and stayed a knight. Not only that, she bloody manned up and forgave the guy when it came time to write his fate in the book. Tyrion realized that all his wit painted the world into a corner and did what his heart wanted - very much like when he executed his girlfriend and father. The great explainer? he got Jon to murder the rightful queen of Westeros for the good of the people. Daenerys has always been a strong character, it's just that her strongest actions have always been betrayal and vengeance. She reached maximum betrayal and vengeance, and experienced maximum betrayal. It is boring that Bran should be king. The argument of the series is that "boring" is better for the smallfolk. The first people we see the series? Bystanders murdered by an ancient grudge and misapplied justice. Who makes out largely okay in Game of Thrones? Hot Pie. Gendry. The Onion Knight. It's an extremely proletariat story wrapped in the trappings of feudalism. Sansa gets to keep the North because nobody wants to go to war with the North. They're really the only army left standing. Arya beheld a pale horse. She looked death in the eye and said "not today." She put her purpose down. The girl with the murder list not only didn't follow The Hound into Hades, she got her fill of killing. Which was the whole point of burning King's Landing - everyone got their fill of killing. Except the Unsullied, who have had humanity driven out of them since they were little boys.
So much delicious, delicious butthurt out there. I drink your tears. Nobody who has paid attention to GoT, who has thought for the first second as to the why of it all, should be the slightest bit surprised or disappointed by the ending. All those parents who named their kids Khaleesi or Danerys? Fuckin' pay attention, you twits. The waif who burns a witch and jumps in the fire with her dragon's eggs after settling in with the rapist who murders her brother? That's a supervillain origin story. The Everyman who shuns rule at every step and gives everything up every single time, knowingly and willingly? Fuckin' A. He gets to go off to winter camp with his dog. Just because Martin made her blonde and cute and slight doesn't mean he wasn't writing Hitler's origin story. Danerys is the girl who double-crosses anyone and everyone, who burns cities to the ground, who sails across the ocean for pure, naked vengeance even when it grinds everyone she knows into dust. The only people she's ever loved are her abusers. She shows no mercy to anyone and is driven entirely and completely by rage and revenge. Yeah - she's been on the right side of history for most of the series but that doesn't make her any less a ruthless sociopath. The writers put this in Tyrion's dialogue. They could not have made it more on the nose. The whole point of the white walkers? Was to illustrate that power-mad sociopaths will set aside their differences for just long enough to avoid extinction and then immediately get back to the business of killing each other. Meanwhile, Martin has woven prophecy deus ex machina throughout the whole thing so that you know - you know - that whatever is important is going to be fated. Not fated? Not important. The red woman knew she had to burn Shireen so that the king could defeat the white walkers... but she thought the king would be Stannis, who got wiped the fuck out. What she did was drive Davos Seaworth so far into regret and disbelief that he split, sided with Jon and got the alliance that got Danerys and Arya to the wall. Danerys, meanwhile, was told she'd never sit on the iron throne, Cersei was told she'd outlive all her children and the fuckin' Lord of Light kept burnin'sword dude alive long enough to save Arya at the end, no matter the spectacularly ridiculous cost. Hodor? Hodor's life was ruined by a fucking time warp Martin went so far in bending causality to show the cruel, iron callousness of fate. Game of Thrones started out as the Wars of the Roses and ended with the Peace of Westphalia. Martin's whole point is it sucks to be royal, royals suck, power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely, and that the ambitious will do fucking anything for power. Eventually you run out of men to fight - the bloodshed in Saxony was so dire during the Thirty Years War that the Catholic church encouraged polygamy for a generation starting in 1650 because there were no men left to marry. Everybody in that series got exactly what they wanted, deserved or were fated for. Arya never wanted to be a queen or a princess. She reminds us of as much and sails off to find what's west of Westeros. Jon never wanted to be king and he doesn't have to. He goes back to the place he was happiest, with his friends and his fucking dog. Tyrion always wanted power but never wanted to rule; he's the hand. Davos ends up about where he started because he was fundamentally content. Samwell becomes maester because that's his jam and he's fuckin' earned it. Braun gets Highgarden because, as he says in his own dialog, royals are just those who were good at killing who get to enjoy it until their kids fuck it all up. Cue Tywin Lannister. Cue Highgarden. Cue Dragonstone. Sunrise, fuckin' Sunset. Even the fuckin' dragon comes out ahead, belonging to nobody, flying out to points unknown, because dragons are mystery and magic and magic has left the fucking building. The whole of that series - the entire purpose of 73 episodes - was to show how someone you love becomes a monster. The whole of that series - the entire purpose of 73 episodes - was to show that if you're true to yourself and true to others, at least you'll avoid torture. Danerys consistently does the wrong thing and ends up burning a city of innocents. Jon consistently does the right thing and comes back from the mutherfucking dead. I mean, consider Catelyn vs. Cirsei - they're both 100% driven not by morals but by the importance of their children. Both do the wrong thing all the time. Catelyn dies Season 2 because nobody else cares about her children; Cirsei makes it to the penultimate episode because she doesn't care about anyone but her children and will spill any and all blood necessary. Game of Thrones is Unforgiven stretched out to nearly 100 hours. Once Danerys snaps, the only question left is "is Jon gonna kill her." Not how, not when, but if because the time is now. And once Jon kills her the only thing left is mopping up, and the board is so bloody and battered that the only possible cleanup is fuck this shit. And that, in a nutshell, is how democracy got a foothold in Europe. You can hate on it all you want but the ending you got is the only ending you were ever going to get, is the only ending that would have satisfied the story. Ned Stark died because he was too busy imposing his morals on everyone to notice he was in a deeply immoral place. Rob Stark died because he was too busy pretending life was fair to notice he was dealing with deeply unfair people. Jon Snow died because he was too busy taking care of others to notice nobody else cared... which is why he had to come back to life and keep doing it. Love is the death of duty, duty is the death of love - I mean, that's just Spock in pseudoshakespearean. Game of Thrones is probably the last thing we'll all watch on television together. It is truly the swan song of mass televised drama. You and everyone you know watched the finale unless you were being contrary - that's 19.3 million people in a country of 330 million. But 86 million in a country of 200 tuned in to find out who shot JR and 104 million - half the bloody population of the country -watched medical army surgical hospital number 4077 go back to the States. I can't think of a more fitting show to end it with and I can't think of a more fitting way to end it.
What We're Reading: And Now Our Watch Has Ended I confess that I don’t know what this means yet, if it even means anything. (I expect some of you will tell me it means nothing and will be mad at me for wasting your time writing about “Game of Thrones.”) But what I do know is that, at least for a brief hour per week over the past several years, millions of people in the world were telling themselves the same story. Even more remarkable, it was a story about the uglier, less savory side of politics, set in a world modeled on medieval Europe, with some dragons added in for good measure, that had so many people from so many different backgrounds similarly enthralled. Somehow, this strange world of Westeros managed to strike a deep chord in many of us about some aspect of political life that is universally experienced. But now the heroes are gone, and the government of King’s Landing has gotten back to mundane administrative duties like improving the water cisterns, repaving the roads, importing food – and so must we all, too.Last week, when I was going through my Monday morning stack of reading, I was struck by a newspaper report about the Iranian government’s attempt to stop cafes in Tehran from hosting “Game of Thrones” screenings. What was striking wasn’t the government’s desire to control what people were watching, but the fact that cafes in Tehran were hosting the same kind of watch parties that I was hosting here in my own home in Texas.
I watched the entire series in the last month or so. It’s been a long slog. I watched the last two episodes last night almost entirely on one click of fast forward because I can’t handle Jon Snow walking around in slow motion with a constipated look on his face any longer than I had to. I’ve disliked him from the start, not because he was the saintly poor bastard, but because he’s such a whiny little bitch about everything. I felt the urge to punch him in the mouth almost every second he was on the screen. khaleesi/Dannygurl was the most ridiculous and terrible storyline all the way along. Out of her entire story arc, two things made sense: when she burned the temple and walked out of it alive probably looked miraculous to the uneducated horsemen and When she freed the unsullied - I guess they didn’t know how to do anything else. But everything else about her story was a waste... which as the series dragged on, made me realize the series might have been a waste. Don’t get me wrong - I’m glad I watched it. I was moderately entertained on average, and more pleased than not along the way - but I guess if I really disliked both of the main character... what does that tell me about how I spend my entertainment time? I couldn’t be more glad that I didn’t waste years thinking and talking about it. I got in, got done, and can put it behind me.
The first 2 episodes made me think we were going to lose some main characters in the epic battle that was coming to Winterfell in an emotional and devastating last stand for humanity. Instead we got subversive fake-out ninja John Wick Some people are waking up to the fact that using algorithmic choices to determine your feeds on youtube and facebook etc leads to a race to the bottom for quality, satisfaction and even enjoyment when the criteria used for judging success is "engagement" because we get distracted by carefully engineered clickbait titles, thumbnails and everything that appeals to our baser impulses. The rest of the season has felt like those exact same algorithms were choosing the characters actions decisions and the plots. It feels like this is precisely how they want us to enjoy their labour. I truthfully envy those people their ability to enjoy it in that way. If you enjoyed it and found it satisfying and thrilling I'm 100% honestly happy for you. I just couldn't. It feels like it's become a self-parodying farce of what is once was. The last episode was like being lowered up to your shoulders into a vat of body temperature porridge. I felt virtually nothing during the finale except for some mild annoyance. I mean what was the point of Edmure fucking Tully or Prince anonymous of Dorne?
I thought the whole season was a terrible rush job and so much seemed moot -- the Night King's too sudden death and end of that whole thread, Jamie and Brienne was such a waste and so poorly done, Jon not choosing to marry his aunt which could have fixed everything... oh c'mon! Yeah, you know all this and more, but -- I liked the last episode. I found it very satisfying. A lot of things tied up more or less neatly in satisfying ways. That's really what I wanted. And I liked that we are left to imagine the continuing storylines. What adventures await Arya? Where is Jon going with the wildlings? And most exciting, will Bran find Drogon? Will he worg into him and bring back the dragon? I'm good with the ending. I choose to overlook a lot because I want it to be an ending a like. And I'm ok with that too.
Jon marrying Danerys would have made him complicit in everything she's done - including roasting Samwell's family alive. It's not the incest that ooks him out, it's that she's a psychopath. She's a convenient psychopath when they need her armies but once her armies are a liability he's done with it. She would have had him murdered eventually anyway - she's rejected everyone she's ever loved because they get in the way of her power and double-crossed her way out of every threat. The balance with Jamie and Cersei is perfect: Jamie surrenders to love over duty while Jon chooses duty over love. That's why he was never going to end up with Brienne - he's not banging his sister because he can't find another girl, he's banging his sister because what matters to him more than anything else in the world is banging his sister. The only people who ever gave a shit about the White Walkers were the Northmen. The only people who had any sense of the White Walkers were the Northmen. For everyone else, The Wall was like Australia - a convenient place to shunt people so you don't have to execute them. Therefore, the only time anyone really rallied behind the North was when it could be demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that they would bring about the end of Westeros. Really, Bran is order and the Night King is entropy; Bran had to employ strategy across the timeline in order to defeat the Night King, who basically marched guilelessly across the landscape. The Battle of Agincourt took a day. The English were outnumbered somewhere between 2 and 6 to 1. They took a couple hundred casualties max and slaughtered something like ten thousand Frenchmen.
Well, Danerys had the ultimate weapons, the most fearsome army in the world, and the love and respect of powerful people around her. She was going to be queen. Jon had a chance to marry her, take a woman he was truly in love with, and together they could have been a great duo. Jon could have reined her in, tempered her anger and arrogance. She wanted desperately the love of the people and saw that the people loved Jon in a way they didn't love her. This is a great bargaining chip in the relationship -- she could follow his example and learn from him and become the kind of leader she so wanted to be. She lost another dragon and then her best friend, and losing Jon as a lover was the thing that pushed her over the top. Imagine if instead Jon said "fuck it I don't care if she's a little more closely related for comfort, I'm going to marry her anyways", it would changed everything. As a duo, fire and ice, they would have a really good shot I think at balancing the whole shebang and becoming something great and worthy of the love of the people. What do you mean by Bran employing strategy across the timeline?
The "woman he was truly in love with" rejected his ways, ratted him out and took part on a murderous raid on his homeland. He tried that alliance thing several seasons ago and and ended up with him ultimately murdered by his own squire. Ygritte was a far gentler human with a whole lot less to lose than Daenerys and he ended up holding her as she bled out, too. She saw that people in WESTEROS loved Jon in a way they didn't love her. She saw what happened in that game in Mireen - she ended up betrayed by her paramour and had to wipe out his entire social class. There's no bargaining here - both parties to your prospective relationship have tried it before and had it end in betrayal, catastrophe and battles that killed thousands. Sure. But over the top she went. The whole of her arc is "how did this person become so mean." She's earned it, no doubt. Ultimately, though, nice people don't march under the banner of the Symbionese Liberation Army. The last three episodes of the series are everyone who knows imagining what would happen if Jon did this. This argument right here is why Tyrion betrayed Varys. It's why Sansa gave up Jon's secret. It's why Tyrion betrayed his queen and freed his brother - half the important players in the game think Daenerys can be reined in, the other half think she's a Targaryen. And even with peace ringing out, even with her enemies defeated, even with everything to gain and nothing to lose, she goes Targaryen in the end. It is not my fault, said the scorpion. It is in my nature. Jon could have reined her in, tempered her anger and arrogance. She wanted desperately the love of the people and saw that the people loved Jon in a way they didn't love her. This is a great bargaining chip in the relationship -- she could follow his example and learn from him and become the kind of leader she so wanted to be.
She wanted desperately the love of the people and saw that the people loved Jon in a way they didn't love her.
She lost another dragon and then her best friend, and losing Jon as a lover was the thing that pushed her over the top.
Imagine if instead Jon said "fuck it I don't care if she's a little more closely related for comfort, I'm going to marry her anyways", it would changed everything.
I was a little disappointed they had Arya go to discover America instead of founding the organization she imagined the Faceless Men were when she set out to join them to replace Varys and his little birds. I might have read too much into the pale horse appearing out of nowhere. Other than that it was fine given that there was a lot of stuff than needed tying up in not much time.
It bothered me that there was 'not much time', yet we had plenty of time to watch Tyrion shuffle chairs... And still (I felt) a lot of loose ends. Everything was just incredibly rushed, and I felt like that marred the significance of what was occurring.
The argument that things were "rushed" is an interesting one to me. The Night King gains a dragon and the wall comes down. There are 8 90-minute episodes left. That's more than the entirety of the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Two thirds of Harry Potter. It's as many episodes as the last "season" of The Sopranos, except each episode is half again as long. It's more episodes than the last season of Mad Men, more episodes than the last season of Breaking Bad. The final season of Game of Thrones is twelve hours. All four Avengers movies is ten hours. So - in more time the ENTIRE AVENGERS SERIES we have to kill the night king - who is either killable or not - and defeat Cersei. That's the show. We go from "undead dragon marching on Winterfell" and "Barbarian hordes landing at Hastings" to "final, inevitable battles" in eight. Ninety minute. Episodes. If you keep in mind that George "RR" Martin worships John "RR" Tolkien, Frodo throws the ring into Mount Doom at Part 2, Chapter 3. That's 2/3rds of the way through Return of the King. Arya kills the Night King at the end of Episode 3. The rest of LoTR is all mop-up. We could have had four episodes of "Who will Sansa marry" and "what book will Samwell write" and "will the Unsullied sail off to chickless Club Med" but instead we had "and also Danerys is Hitler" which, as above, she's been raised in a revenge plot environment since she was a mewling babe. The Starks wanna be left alone in a world free of White Walkers. Danerys wants to wipe out everyone who doesn't bend the knee. We got six hours of "how do you solve a problem like Maria" and yes. We got to watch two minutes of shuffling chairs. Because in the end? We had 73 episodes to show us it's nothing but shuffling chairs. Just had my teeth cleaned. The dental hygenist was mad because she doesn't know what the dragon is gonna do with the dead queen. You're not supposed to know. Some ends are supposed to be loose. Although someone on Twitter did quip "behind every king there's a woman who dragged him around for three years never to be heard from again." I appreciated that one.
When you put it into that context it is a lot of time. And absolutely it could have been a snooze-fest after the Night King's demise. I'm not unhappy with the plot at all (other than what the hell was Bran doing warging in Winterfell? Was he just trying to get a better view of the battle? - actually, maybe I'm just super slow... Was he warging so the Night King would be able to find him?) the dragon is gonna do with the dead queen. This made me chuckle a bit. I'm going back to work today after a week on holiday - it will be interesting to see what my colleagues made of the finale. If I'm honest... I had a horrible premonition as Drogon flew off of some stupid dragon egg unhatching reveal a la Godzilla (1998). Very glad that wasn't the case.The dental hygenist was mad because she doesn't know what
Did you read the books? I don't say that to indicate "you are not a true fan if you didn't read the books" because fuckin' hell, the last book was a snoozer. But an early and often divergence between the books and the series is "warging". Arya makes one appearance in the entire fourth book - having gone blind in the third - and that's to "warg" around and kick the shit out of her master amongst the Faceless Men. Martin makes it crystal clear that what makes Arya such a ninja badass is her ability to "warg" into whatever random creatures are around long enough to get a good sense of the battleground and then "warg" back to open a can of whoopass. I think the showrunners took a long, hard look at the source material and said "let's minimize this 'jumping into other bodies' bit as much as possible because it's confusing and off the spine." I also get the sense that they reduced the airtime of the wolves. They were a lot more important in the book. I don't think this was a bad decision - but I think it made the whole "warging" thing confusing and weird. Bran was drawing attention to himself, plain and simple. Which is a pretty weak use of the all-seeing, all-knowing eye but really, battles are often won by the stupidest shit.
I did read the books, but that was so long ago that I'm not confident enough in my memory of the source material to draw any real comparisons. (I completely forgot that Arya was even able to warg). Having said that, I think you're right about the downplaying of the wolves. They seemed a much more integral part of the written material than the series. I'll definitely have to go through the books again for a refresher.
Arya has never been a joiner. She told us in the beginning she didn't want to be a princess. She is given exactly three chances to do something other than satisfy her vengeance in that show - the first time she saves the faceless man and gets an invite. The second time she leaves the Hound for dead (and robs him) but he comes back and becomes her only friend. The third time she tries to lead a mother and child to safety and they're burned to death by a dragon minutes later. The white horse is for us: - Revelation 6:7-8 Arya legit beholds a pale horse and turns her back on death. She goes from "murder list" to "marco polo" because while she's wandered all over creation looking for better ways to kill, she hasn't stopped to smell the flowers. Arya ends the series going where she has no wrongs to right, no enemies to slay and no reason to open a can of whoop-ass on anyone.When the Lamb broke the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth living creature saying, “Come.” I looked, and behold, an ashen horse; and he who sat on it had the name Death; and Hades was following with him. Authority was given to them over a fourth of the earth, to kill with sword and with famine and with pestilence and by the wild beasts of the earth.
Yeah, I got the allusion to Revelation, I just thought it meant the Many-Faced God was watching out for her for some reason, because she did pass her initiation even if she didn't stick around after. Giving up violence for sailing is a nicer ending than the one I thought was coming, and it makes sense, it just seemed out of the blue because I was expecting the Westrosi Inquisition.