While not exactly a New Year's resolution, I am trying to get back into arting again. I have a love-hate relationship with this particular hobby--I enjoy the creative process generally, but have very low frustration tolerance when it comes to my own abilities (or lack thereof). If I'm honest with myself I think I have some basic talent, but really struggle to translate that into something I'm happy with.
I haven't really figured out why that is. As a martial artist I'm used to seeing how far I have to go--all I have to do is touch hands with an older brother, uncle, or my teacher. But for some reason I find that inspiring rather than frustrating. But with drawing, I get the opposite result. Looking at something masterful doesn't inspire me, it just frustrates me and makes me feel like I'm wasting my time. As I said, I'm really unclear on why these two things are so different in my head, despite a lot of time trying to figure that out. I know I aim too high in my expectations of my artistic ability. And I'm pretty sure this is related to how I self-evaluate. With kung fu it's more a question of degree...that is, a technique may work more or less, but there are ways to refine it. With drawing, if I'm genuinely unhappy with what I've done, then why am I doing it? It's not really about showing off or being embarassed about where I am, but more that some theoretical future improvement is just too abstract. My general approach to this is to keep my expectations more short-term, or even eliminate them altogether. That's how I'm handling Greek: I'm not expecting a certain proficiency at a certain time, I just say "ok, at such and such a time you're going to study."
With Greek I'm still interested, and I enjoy figuring out what a sentence means in small doses. With art, it requires a lot more of a time sink per session, and I feel like I get so much less out of each unit of time. It may be as simple as the little milestones--with Greek, I can see that I've learned these words or whatever. With art, it's more abstract (heh).
This of course ties into a broader issue with my personality, which is a form of learned helplessness. Not in the way that term is usually used, though (that would be way too simple). But I grew up not really appreciating my effect on the world, and not really understanding how to be satisfied with anything. I think it stems from a combination of being underchallenged academically (school was always easy, and it's hard to be satisfied with easy things) and self-protection (if you're not emotionally invested in what you do, it doesn't matter if you fail). I'm slowly allowing myself to mess things up, which helps life in general, but I still struggle in my artistic journey with being unhappy. But it's still something I really want to get good at, so I'm not any happier by not doing it. A vicious cycle. Meanwhile, I keep seeing this really cool stuff in my head, but it gets garbled trying to put it out there. It's like living in a country where you don't speak the language very well, and you end up with this barrier between you and the outside world.
Intellectually, I know the only way to get better is to do it. What I have to figure out, though, is how to reduce my frustration levels to a manageable level, since right now that side tends to win out. I also kind of psyche myself out, where I expect frustration to be the only result, so don't bother trying.
I know some of you on here do various creative pursuits (thenewgreen is the most prominent in my personal feed), so how do y'all cope with this? I'm willing to do the work, I just have to figure out how not to hate every second (usually followed by giving up for a few months).
If the question was 'how do I git gud?' there's your answer. But the question isn't 'how do I git gud?' it's 'How do I not hate the process of gittin' gud?' which is a much harder question. I suspect I'm still too immature to have a good answer to it. I still hate every minute of my exercise bike. It's taken over a year of regular yoga practice to get to a point that I don't actively hate each minute of yoga, and that's mostly because I now NEED yoga to feel 'normal.' I also suspect that people who were in competitive athletics of some variety as a child have an easier time with this, particularly people who did multiple sports. From where i'm sitting, it's easier to have subjective appreciation for the development of a talent/skill when you are concurrently developing other talents/skills. I'm not expecting a certain proficiency at a certain time, I just say "ok, at such and such a time you're going to study."
That is indeed the question, and I too haven't found an answer (hence my post). I hadn't thought about the connection with sports, but I had only tepid interest as a kid, and have never been especially competitive. I've also never been especially motivated at much of anything, so maybe there is a connection somewhere....
It's funny to hear the lawyer describe himself as unmotivated. I think competitiveness is a big factor. There is a breed of human out there that really gets off on being better at a thing than someone else. Not from being good at something, but from the comparative 'Better than X at Y.' I think that type of person derives a lot of satisfaction from practice, because it's a known way to beat the living tar out of someone else.
Haha, well, I didn't work especially hard in law school (and my grades showed it). I suspect there's something to the competitiveness thing, as I said somewhere in this thread (I think), but I'm not sure how that plays out in this context.
As with everything, there are aspects of doing what you want to do that you will like, but other that you will despise. You need to find the balance between doing the part you like and doing the ones you don't. After you find the balance, just keep creating projects. Always finish a project that you have started, even if you find a better technique along the way. Write you main goal on a piece of paper, then write the steps that you will need to accomplish to achieve it. Then, get gud at it.
I don't do art, so you can take this with a grain of salt. I saw a video by a guy that was about his art style. He went from a very skilled realistic art style to a simple cartoon style. He was saying that while it's important to get the fundamentals down, it's also important that art is about expressing oneself. If it becomes about trying to make something look better and better, it sometimes becomes less about an expression of yourself and a connection with other people, which is the whole point of art. Edit: Much later. I saw this video about the basic mistakes of beginners, but she really means everyone. She talks about knowing your tools, practicing enough, using references, comparing yourself to others and not learning the fundamentals. She has tutorials on the fundamentals. She also commented about viewing the art of others. Something I learned recently is that professional artists use references. I didn't realize that.
I can recount the story of how I went from drawing like a 3-year old to drawing almost photo-realistic pencil drawings of purses I was designing, but ... I was at an art school, learning Fashion Design, and taking an art class. A fellow student sat me down and - while we both held our own pencils - I copied his technique and found out it worked for me, too. That one time. But words are my thing, not drawing. So I had the problem with words, stories, writing, discipline, etc. And here is what works for me every single time: Stephen King's book "On Writing". Yes, that Stephen King. This book is weird - it started off as a "How to become a writer" book, and then he got hit by a car and it became an autobiography. Sort of. The important thing is that he has a system for writing, and it just works. The basic premise is that creativity is a muscle like any other, and you need to exercise it to make it work. What he does is set aside a specific time every single day to do this one thing (in his case, Writing), and he does that one thing at that specific time every single day. Eventually, he finds that "creativity" is a faucet your can turn on and off with regular training. Repeat this pattern for an amount of time, and your mind learns that this is your Creative Time, and therefore turns on the creativity at that time when you sit down to do that work. So read the book. It is much better than all that. But the premise of "how to get gud" is basically to train your brain to be "in the right mode" when you go to learn that thing you want to do better.
I also read Stephen King's book. I'll add to the point you got which was to write consistently. His other piece of advice that struck me was to read constantly. He felt it was important for people to see what great writing was and what lousy writing was. It's important for people to create their own style by knowing what other people's styles look like. Applying that to art, I would think it would mean viewing art constantly as well as trying to create it.
There's a lot of important reflection in your post. I'll start at the end. It is an inevitable truth that you have to accept when it comes to art. The process of mastering anything is unavoidably full of frustration: a finished piece is never as good as what you initially imagined, things always take longer than you expect, there's often no-one around to just tell you what you need to do to improve. In the long run, it's likely that you'll quite often find yourself periods of frustration on various levels of the process. There's a great excerpt from the book 'Infinite Jest' that that touches on this: Ultimately, the only way through this frustration is will power and trust in the process. This isn't the answer people generally like to hear, but it's the truth. And honestly, the frustration never gets that much easier. But you you will get used to feeling frustrated and start to see it not as burden but as catalyst for action. Because if you're frustrated it at least means you know something 'is wrong, which means your on the first step improving and getting better. There is one thing that makes it a bit easier though: discipline. Sit down every day (or whatever you schedule) and do some drawing. Make it purposeful drawing too; coming to a blank piece of paper with no impetus is often fatal to the process. So before you sit down, known what it is you're going to, even if it's just a rough idea. Today you're going to draw a flower; tomorrow you're going to practice your shading; the next day you're just going to use pens, whatever; maybe you liked the flower and the shading practice gave you new ideas, so you revisit and revise the flower. Keep the momentum going and keep completing pieces. Soon enough you'll feel compelled to work regardless of frustration. In regards to your Kung Fu vs. drawing issue, I think it may be that you're relating to your Kung Fu development on a micro level (i.e. individual techniques) and drawing on a macro level (i.e. a complete picture). In my limited martial arts experience, whenever I touched hands with a senior student or teacher, I was directly practising a singular technique. A kick, punch, or block. I not only got real-time feedback of my own attempts, but got to feel what it was like to be on the receiving end of my partner's higher mastery of the technique. This adds up to create a highly efficient and effective learning environment. On the other hand, with drawing it seems like you're looking at a great artist's complete picture, comparing it your own, and getting demoralised. This is like watching a black belt perfectly execute their grading routine after you've just managed your first complete run through of a white belt routine. Then the black belt turns to you and says "good luck, kid." Do you see what I'm getting at? It's essentially the same with drawing, or any art. Even humanity's greatest masterpieces can be broken down into a collection of techniques. Use of shading, contrast, colour, line thickness, etc. And these things can always be refined. So whilst it's unavoidable that you'll judge your drawing as complete picture, remember to also analyse it from the a technique level. Maybe you don't like the drawing overall, but you can see you did the shading really well. Or perhaps you do like the picture overall, but you feel your use of colour let you down. These are the sort things that you can then take to your next piece and improve upon or combine in different ways. Practice that technique specifically like you would a punch in Kung Fu if it really needs work. Also do this for the artist's work who you admire. Why do you like it? What techniques are they using and how? Then steal their ideas and try them yourself. In my own compositions about half a year ago, I identified that my sound design wasn't as good as I wanted it to be. I have been composing for 10 years and have produced a good amount of tracks, so it wasn't one of those things that was just going to improve on it's own. So I sat down and practiced it specifically. I found a in depth online course to help me along and made sure that I found ways to use my new skills in my work. Now, 6 months later, my sound design is a hell of a lot better. It's still not where I want it to be, but it's getting there. I think this is the kind of approach you need to have. That's art for you. With Kung Fu there's a structural progression and concrete, defined things you need to do to reach the peak of that progression. With art, there is none of that and you have to decide what your end goal is and then figure out your own steps to get there. I can relate to you on this. I've always felt that I've been working towards some ideal in my head. Yet that ideal is obscured and I can only discover what it looks like by creating things which align to. Unfortunately, I think this is again just the way it is. But remember, just because you're unhappy with what you've done, it doesn't mean that it wasn't beneficial to do. So when it comes down it, you answered your own question. The solution is to do hard work and lots of it. In the moment, the work is often far from as enjoyable or as fulfilling as you might like. Stick with it for the long run, and it will be. It's great you're willing to do it, but you also need to be willing to put up with all the hurdles and hardship along the way.Intellectually, I know the only way to get better is to do it. What I have to figure out, though, is how to reduce my frustration levels to a manageable level, since right now that side tends to win out. I also kind of psyche myself out, where I expect frustration to be the only result, so don't bother trying... I know some of you on here do various creative pursuits, so how do y'all cope with this?
"...His point is that progress towards genuine Show-caliber mastery is slow, frustrating, humbling. A question of less talent than temperament... You proceed toward mastery through a series of plateaus, so there's like radical improvement up to a certain plateau and then what looks like a stall, on the plateau, with the only way to get off one of the plateaus and climb up to the next one up ahead is with a whole lot of frustrating mindless repetitive practice and patience and hanging in there." Infinite Jest - David Foster Wallace (Full Excerpt)
With kung fu it's more a question of degree...that is, a technique may work more or less, but there are ways to refine it
With drawing, if I'm genuinely unhappy with what I've done, then why am I doing it? It's not really about showing off or being embarassed about where I am, but more that some theoretical future improvement is just too abstract
Thanks for sharing this. I think the biggest issue for me that you touched on was trust. With my martial arts career I have a teacher and older brothers whom I trust, so I have much more faith that I can get better. With drawing I don't have this. The one time I took an art class (which I do think helped my abilities) I was able to dump a lot more energy into it for that same reason. I also have enough history in kung fu at this point that I can see the progression, i.e. where I needed to work on x, did so, and improved. Related to this, I think we have a tendency to see art, like math or science, as something people either "get" or they don't. So when I see my kung fu teacher's ability, I know that no one just "gets" kung fu, but I see what's possible through work. I'm slowly reshaping my thoughts on the art front to mirror this. You're of course totally right about needing to pick one thing and work on it. Part of my frustration, of course, is not even knowing what that one thing actually is, although a lot of that comes back to the trust thing I described above. I do think something more structured would really help me a lot, but I don't really have the time or money to pursue a formal class. The site who shall not be named has an ArtBuddy sub, but that seems more geared towards joint feedback and accountability, and I'm not in a place where I can say more than "that doesn't look right but I can't say why." In other words, I'm not looking for a collaboration, I need someone who will give me feedback exclusively. It occurs to me as I type this that my town has a big and well-regarded art school as part of its larger university, so I wonder if I could find a starving art student who could give me some informal instruction?
Ira Glass seems to explain it quite well. Here's my two cents: Haven't been writing for months. Whenever I say I'm getting back into it, I just abandon it again. Same with visual arts, by the way: whatever I do in Photoshop nowadays comes from an external idea or motivation. It's exciting to get back to it but difficult not to quit after hitting an obstacle. My guess is - we both think ourselves somehow good artists by default, despite having no education or little practice. Perhaps we're confusing the good taste we possess with skill that has to be claimed through hard work. We think that because we see those amazing images in our heads, we're somehow supposed to be able to reproduce them perfectly - after all, anger is a response to reality being inferior to our expectations. I used to feel the same about coding, as well: being unable to pull off this or that mechanic usually resulting in pushing the project off, big or small, usually forever. Now... I guess I found out I wasn't a programming genius and am just enjoying doing good. Writing code has always given me pleasure, whether for a personal small library or a big-dreams game. Finding out that I wasn't actually going to be able to work it in a day made me enjoy small steps more. I have no advice for you, I'm afraid. I'm struggling with it the same as you do. Maybe some of what I wrote will come in handy. Maybe we'll even crack this together in a conversation.
Yeah, I think you're right, and I especially like your description of anger as "reality being inferior to our expectations." That quote you linked is particularly on point. On the one hand, I'm not truly looking for a short-cut. I'm willing to do the work. I'm just trying to figure out a way to make the work not abjectly miserable. But I think the idea of "fighting your way through" is absolutely true, and it may simply be the case that it's going to suck for awhile. You know, I joke with some of the guys I do kung fu with about how we're not trying to "get better" or "get good," we're trying to suck less. That may just be the right way to think about it.
A few people around here have been talking about getting back into a habit of drawing. I had good intentions too, but haven't followed up. Somebody should just bite the bullet and scribble something and post it under #drawing. If I don't see anything by Friday I commit to applying a Bic to a napkin and creating something guaranteed non-masterful.