By Craig Whitlock and Bob Woodward
- The Pentagon has buried an internal study that exposed $125 billion in administrative waste in its business operations amid fears Congress would use the findings as an excuse to slash the defense budget, according to interviews and confidential memos obtained by The Washington Post.
- “We are spending a lot more money than we thought,” the report stated. It then broke down how the Defense Department was spending $134 billion a year on business operations — about 50 percent more than McKinsey had guessed at the outset.
Almost half of the Pentagon’s back-office personnel — 457,000 full-time employees — were assigned to logistics or supply-chain jobs. That alone exceeded the size of United Parcel Service’s global workforce.
The Pentagon’s purchasing bureaucracy counted 207,000 full-time workers. By itself, that would rank among the top 30 private employers in the United States.
More than 192,000 people worked in property management. About 84,000 people held human-resources jobs.
- On June 2, 2015, Navy Secretary Ray Mabus delivered a speech at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. He complained that 20 percent of the defense budget went to the Fourth Estate — the defense agencies that provide support to the armed forces — and called it “pure overhead.”
How would slashing the administrative waste budget be anything like slashing the defense budget? One of the big problems of government that no one, not even conservatives, often talks about is the internal lobby. Lobbyists aren't exclusively corporate or NGO. Huge numbers of them are government employees fighting to keep the jobs of the people in a given department. The results are the same as a lot of corporate lobbying: the dedication of tax dollars to a really inefficient jobs program. $125B isn't chump change even by the federal government's standards. And the GOP, our protectors against government waste, refused to consider defense cuts as a compromise in the fiscal cliff debacle. Just when I think I can't think less of Republicans in Congress something always comes up.