a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by fr33lunch
On the subject of Hubski and news aggregators, I've been thinking more about how Hubski seems to fit a collaborative filtering model more than an aggregation model As I see it, the "filtering" is done through recommendations to a larger extent than autonomous coding. Thoughts?




mk  ·  4520 days ago  ·  link  ·  
I agree, and it's by design. Personally, I do not think that 'majority vote' systems support the best content. Or at least, they run counter to efforts to sustain a quality experience that doesn't align to majority tastes. IMO the ability to create (and sustain) a quality yet unpopular minority experience is key to a dynamic and healthy community, online and off.

What I am writing will touch on some of this. I'd like to hear what else you think about it though.

fr33lunch  ·  4520 days ago  ·  link  ·  
I agree. I was just talking with some folks about Hubski and the usual question of, what is that? came up. I find myself calling it a social and news aggregator, but when I describe it further it always sounds less like an aggregator and more like a collaborative. I realize that this is the intended model for Hubski, so I suppose I just didn't agree with the categorization I've seen go along with it.
mk  ·  4519 days ago  ·  link  ·  
I still have a difficult time describing Hubski. thenewgreen is much better at it. The language that is available seems to quickly give the impression of something that it isn't.
thenewgreen  ·  4519 days ago  ·  link  ·  
I spent an entire night talking with people at a TechCrunch gathering about Hubski and I left thinking to myself, "mk is so much better at describing Hubski". -We may be in trouble ;-)

Seriously, I would describe it in short and say, If you are truly interested in what Hubski is, you have to Hubski.