shrug when the original post basically states "yes there are some people who Hubski isn't going to be right for" and then someone is like "blah blah I think you're wrong about hubski" frankly engaging any further seems kind of pointless. Some people aren't going to like everything. The post said that. And then some person came along and said they didn't like everything. Like, what a huge shocker and valuable insight that something already predicted happened!
isn't the post about what hubski could do better? in general, he is somewhat correct (i gave percentages!). in specifics, he is lacking. for the record although i agree with some of his criticisms i do not think there is much hubski could do better. except formatting. its failings are failings of the internet in general. but as mk's implied goal is to be better than the rest of the internet, never hurts to put the thinking cap on.