This is the McDonnell-Douglass A-12 Avenger II.
It doesn’t exist. It was supposed to be a carrier-based Close Air Support (CAS) bomber replacement for the A-6 intruder until Dick Cheney killed it in 1990. They built a mock-up. It’s at Veteran’s Memorial Airpark in Fort Worth, and has been since 2013. It was affectionately called “the flying Dorito.”
This is the TR-3B.
It’s such a delightful part of the paranoid UFO conspiracy-sphere that it made the X Files. That’s Mulder, right before Area 51 security hit him with the flashy flashy to wipe his memory in S01E02, “Dreamland.” It’s reverently called “the Black Manta.”
It doesn’t exist, either. Or does it?
___________________________________________________________
Here’s what we know. Something triangular, that isn’t a B-2 and isn’t an RQ-170, has been seen over Texas and Kansas. It has been seen a few times, multiple examples at a time, and the official explanations thereof are lacking. What follows is an exercise in speculation, an Occam’s Razor of tinfoil hattery, a masturbatory adventure in conjecture because I don’t have a blog and because this shit fascinates me. I have no inside knowledge about any of this, much as I might want to, and am probably wrong. But it sure feels right.
___________________________________________________________
PART 1: CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
So a funny thing about the A-12, being that it never existed, is that spare parts have shown up at government auctions. An online salvage fan ended up buying the canopy for an A-12 Avenger II from Purdue University for $2300. Provenance was established - the serial numbers match, the chain of title matches. This is a real canopy for an imaginary plane.
It was sold on eBay for well over half a million dollars. Worthy of note - this is SOP for “classified things” that end up unclassified - they get bought. I have a… book that shouldn’t have been published. It’s a limited run, vanity press, esoteric, and it cost me $70. Depending on the month, I can “buy” a copy of it on Amazon for somewhere between $2500 and $9500. I’ve discovered that when I mention it online the price goes up. It’s far easier to snatch up all the copies extant than get all legal on their owners because that generates news. So “an unnamed bidder” paying $620k for corner-case aviation memorabilia isn’t weird.
The imaginary plane the real canopy belongs to was to be built by McDonnell-Douglas, which merged with Boeing in 1997 - one year before one of McDonnell’s weirder craft first took to the air:
That’s the Boeing Bird of Prey, a low-cost, secret technology demonstrator built at McD/Boeing’s expense for unspecified reasons. Take a look at the canopy.
…so here’s the thing about stealth technology. There’s one mammer-jammer equation that governs radar reflection, at least as far as RCS (Radar Cross Section) is concerned. A clever Russian by the name of Petr Ufimtsev came up with it back in the ‘60s behind the Iron Curtain but nobody in the USSR really knew what he was talking about. Meanwhile a clever cat at Lockheed Skunk Works (who brought you the SR-71, the F-117, the U-2, the F-104, the P-38 and lots of other nifty technology) by the name of Denys Overholser realized that Ufimtsev’s equation basically says it’s the shape, not the size of a reflective surface that determines the RCS and if you can control the shape properly, the RCS of your stealth pigeon is the same as the RCS of your stealth tennis court assuming they’re the same shape.
Simple shapes are easy to run the numbers on. Complex shapes are not. This is why the F-117A looks like a poorly-rendered vector model from BattleZone -
That’s what the computers of the time (‘70s) were capable of.
So take a look at that F-117 and know that it has the RCS of somewhere between a bumblebee and a golf ball. They actually deploy a little target when they’re coming in for a landing so that they show up to air traffic control. Know also that what RCS it has comes form the air intakes and the cockpit - the reflection from the wings and body is effectively zero.
Which means when you’re developing a stealth prototype, you give a shit about the cockpit, you give a shit about the engine nacelles, you give a shit about the control surfaces… but the majority of the aircraft you can solve by inspection.
The first radar test target for what became the F-117A was referred to as “the Hopeless Diamond” because of its odd shape and the fact that nobody felt very positive about its characteristics in flight. So far as I know, the appearance of the “Hopeless Diamond” has never been declassified. The first flight prototype for the eventual F-117A was called “Have Blue.” It was built at Lockheed’s expense towards an eventual Lockheed sale of the F-117. It was a little smaller than half the size of the F-117… except for the engine nacelles and cockpit.
Have Blue wasn’t the last stealth test mule we know about, either. Here’s the Northrop Tacit Blue:
Ignore, if you will, the control surfaces and pay special attention to the cockpit and engine nacelles. See if they don’t look similar to another Northrop product:
Here’s a timeline:
1977 - Lockheed Have Blue flies
1979 - last Lockheed Have Blue crashes
1981 - Lockheed F-117 first flies
1983 - Lockheed F-117 achieves operational capability
1988 - Lockheed F-117 revealed to the public, Have Blue declassified
Here’s another timeline:
1982 - Northrop Tacit Blue flies
1985 - Northrop Tacit Blue retired
1989 - Northrop B-2 first flies (and is made public - at a unit cost of over a billion dollars each, they’re hard to keep secret)
1996 - Northrop Tacit Blue declassified
1997 - Northrop B-2 achieves operational capability
Here’s another timeline:
1991 - McD A-12 Avenger II cancelled
1996 - McD Bird of Prey first flies
1997 - Boeing buys McD
1999 - Boeing Bird of Prey retires
2003 - Boeing Bird of Prey declassified
2003-2004 - A-12/TR-3 first flies?
2007-2009 - A-12/TR-3 achieves operational capability?
2017-2020 - A-12/TR-3 declassified?
_________________________________________________________
Parts II and III as I get to them
I'm sorry, super late to the party, but I think you might've just re-confirmed that I saw the F-117 back in about 1998. It was in the dead of night, at this boy scout summer camp. Same summer I learned the value of a lock-blade, 8 stitches later. Stupid Swiss Army knife. I managed to (maybe) identify it because I had this thing as a kid. The Nighthawk (y u no namedrop?) flew over our campground, relatively low to the ground, and slow enough to make out the triangular shape, without making a sound. I was alone, nobody believed me, and I had no way of easily finding out whether or not there was a nearby military base with Nighthawks. Thanks.
I didn't call it a "nighthawk" because I grew up with this thing: That thing caused such a sensation there were congressional hearings about a fucking plastic model. Based on the success Testor's came out with a Soviet version, which was supposed to be slower, shittier, and primarily just a bomber: So one fine friday, the day we were all piling onto the school bus to go to music camp, this bullshit shows up: It was a horrific letdown. It's slower, shittier and basically just a bomber. The brilliant stealth future we were promised was actually our parodic Soviet past. A couple years later they were used in anger for the first time in Panama and succeeded in hitting exactly fuckall. Then Desert Shield happened and that was such a jingoistic clusterfuck that watching dead iraqi kids on FLIR would make a pacifist out of anyone. Then a few more years pass and fuckin' back-asswards Serbians using weapons we were assured were obsolete plucked one out of the sky. I grew up with this: Yours is a Mitchell Gant world and Ben Rich gives you the "hopeless diamond". Fuckin' "nighthawk." please.
It was like a prescient military embodiment of the 80's polygon obsession, right? Of course the aerodynamics were terrible, with a series of flat surfaces instead of smooth tapering, it had to fly slow. No similar planes exist anymore, soooooo not a good look? Missiles, and then drones, both at least sometimes using laser targeting (and other tech that I totally can't imagine whatsoever) killed the bomber, along with anti-aircraft tech. Oh, and the Space Force. It's crazy, but no drawbacks were ever mentioned on the mail-order binder page for the F-117. In fact, no airplane had drawbacks. Drawbacks are not a thing to worry about, m'boy. My entire childhood is full of shit like this. In fact, it was only a few years ago that I found out thanksgiving is a fucking lie. Embarrassing.
The '80s polygon obsession was due to '80s processing power. That '80s processing power belonged to the government in the '70s. People forget: The Last Starfighter was rendered on a goddamn Cray X-MP. Some wag pointed out that the F-117 was the first, last and only airframe ever designed by electrical engineers.
Of course! I'm intimately familiar with the triangle mesh of stereo lithography (.stl) files. Hadn't made that connection yet. Thanks.
Those are curves. The world in the '80s belonged to polygons. Somewhere I have a Rhino 0.9 disc from McNeel & Associates. They were the local AutoCAD vendor and had been failing for more than a decade to convince Autodesk that there was a place for non-platonic solids in engineering so they came out with their own. They actually spelled out "Non-Uniform Reticulated Rational B-Spline" on the face. I did finite element analysis in the late '90s. We were still very much integrating by polygons. Deep down in the heart of it all, all your NURBS processing is integration by parts anyway.
Great write up. Thanks. edit: It appears that the A-12 canopy ebay auction was cancelled due to "an error in the listing". Whatever that means. And I see no mention of it since. Source p.s. Oh man I loved that tank game. Battlezone I think it was called?
"Oops. It turns out I don't actually have an A-12 Avenger II canopy for sale after all... instead I have a large stack of unmarked hundos. My bad!"
It's been ages, but when I was younger I could play the arcade-version Battlezone as long as I wanted on one quarter. The key is to drive backwards full-speed, and shift your tack slightly when you need to, to avoid being hit. You can take pot-shots at all your pursuers at will. Fun times.
You might like to read this. http://nextbigfuture.com/2015/08/us-b-3-stealth-bomber-planned-for-2025.html?m=1