- My willingness to speak out about all this is shaped by the fact that I have tenure. But to the extent that tenure represents some amount of safety and security, what good is it if it only inspires cowardice? If it only inspires you to hold on to it so desperately that you can never be bothered to try to make this world (or your own campus) less hostile for someone else? If it only inspires you to avoid speaking out against unfairness and injustice?
Students are consumers. They do have a choice in where they attend higher education, and if they do not like the education they are receiving then they are free to transfer. That said, I think that professors are afraid of the wrong thing here. While teaching controversial topics may offend, I believe that more students will be offended by lackluster course presentations. As long as controversial topics are not rammed down anyone's throats, and people are given a structured means of responding, then I believe that professors have nothing to worry about. I guess what I am trying to say in an ineloquent manner is that there is more than one thing to be afraid of, and under-performing is as real a fear as teaching something controversial.When I read about professors being afraid of their own students and changing what they teach in response to that fear, I'm struck by two things. First, I understand why they're afraid. After my decade and a half in the classroom, I can confidently add to the chorus suggesting that universities increasingly treat students like consumers. As administrators seem more concerned with enrollment dollars than students' learning, instructors receive a clear message: "The customer is always right.
I wish American culture would emphasize that college isn't a degree factory, but a place to be put against new and, sometimes uncomfortable, situations and ideas. The whole idea that you are put in a building with hundreds of skilled and knowledgeable persons, and you can talk to any one of them and have them critique your thinking, is a truly magical situation. Yet I see so many people squander the opportunity by viewing their non-major classes as an inconvenience to overcome, and in the worst cases, their major-classes as an obstacle to a job.As administrators seem more concerned with enrollment dollars than students' learning, instructors receive a clear message: "The customer is always right."
I'm a tenured professor at Ohio State University. I have taught at the college level for more than 15 years — more than five as graduate student instructor, seven as a tenure-track professor, and three with tenure. More on how professors react to their students
I'm a liberal professor, and my liberal students terrify me I was a liberal adjunct professor. My liberal students didn’t scare me at all. When I read about professors being afraid of their own students and changing what they teach in response to that fear, I'm struck by two things. First, I understand why they're afraid. After my decade and a half in the classroom, I can confidently add to the chorus suggesting that universities increasingly treat students like consumers. As administrators seem more concerned with enrollment dollars than students' learning, instructors receive a clear message: "The customer is always right." I think that if the reason they are changing their lesson is fear, than I agree with this guy. There is something to be said about teaching based on the current times an what is needed as far as educating.I'm a professor. My colleagues who let their students dictate what they teach are cowards.
by Koritha Mitchell on June 10, 2015