a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by coffeesp00ns
coffeesp00ns  ·  3598 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Hubski, why is Reddit compared negatively to this website?

I just kind of had this thought while perusing the comments here:

When you start reddit, you get "everything", or at least a vast majority of what they think you will like based on community size and activity. After that, you have to both add other streams and filter out what you DON'T want.

Hubski skips the vast majority of this by starting you with a relatively clean slate. Unless you follow that person, or that tag, odds are you won't see it. In theory, this how reddit is designed to work, but in practice most people talk about having to filter out what they don't want.

{edit: to add to this analogy, often the top-level subreddit in a category is still not what you want. you may need to go down several layers of specificity to get to the kind of content and conversation you want to see. Every time you add a stream of content, you have to filter it to your desired level.}

Reddit is like bottled water, where you filter out what you don't want. Hubski is like not-from-concentrate orange juice: everything's been removed, and you add in only what is to your taste.

maybe i just perceive it that way because i've been here for a year, but I think i've hit the filter button twice? maybe three times. all websites spamming their own low-content crap.

{edit: but then, aren't we describing Eternal September in a nutshell? the general degradation of content and discourse as more users are introduced? Regardless of the intentions of hubski's dream team, if this place were inundated repeatedly with new people at 1 50th of the level that reddit gets every day, the culture here would be gone very quickly. Subreddits probably saved reddit in a lot of ways, but they really only delayed the inevitable slide that is mass discourse.

wow. that got dark. Sorry evybubby}





elizabeth  ·  3598 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Not sure I understand the reddit: bottled water hubski:orange juice analogy. I feels like it should be the other way around. Could you explain a bit more?

coffeesp00ns  ·  3597 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  

frankly, it's because it's not a great analogy, because it requires you to know a fair bit about not-from-concentrate orange juice.

To transport NFC juice, they have to take out all of the essential oils, etc. that will spoil in transport. Meaning, if you drank orange juice from the tanker truck, it wouldn't taste like much. Once it gets to wherever it's being bottled, they add all those essences, oils, etc back.

With me so far?

The cool/interesting thing about this, and sort of the thing that makes the analogy, is that these companies will modify what oils and essences they put back in to suit the tastes of that geographic area. Maybe Northern US cities prefer a sweeter orange juice, where in western Canada they prefer a more tangy orange juice. They can modify their mix to suit.

Interestingly, this came up in the news again just a few days ago and I didn't even know until i went looking for sources.

So the analogy makes sense, but only if you know about this one specific thing about NFC orange juice. That makes it probably a bad analogy.

elizabeth  ·  3597 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Ohhhh I get it now!

Ahaa now I know more than I'd ever need to know about orange juice and it's great. Time to go impress people with my orange juice knowledge ;)