a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by user-inactivated

    I don't know if it's that simple. Some contracts can be offensive in nature. If PETA said that they would pay the water bill for anyone that would give a handjob, then it would entirely consensual for both parties, but very upsetting.

I understand the argument but I disagree. There's a correlating argument about the morality of prostitution. I just don't see any reason to be upset if my beginning state is "no water" and my ending state is "no water but with an option to get water which I under no circumstances have to acknowledge."