Exactly. A prosecutor asks for an indictment, and presents only the evidence necessary to establish probably cause typically. In this case, the prosecutor did not ask for an indictment and just backed the entire truck of evidence up on the jury and said "Here you go. Do what you want with it." It was designed to increase the odds of the outcome he wanted.
I can't approach him with a 10' pole on the subject. It's all I can do to keep him from vomiting on about 'those people' unsolicited. For all his intimate knowledge on the subject, he is incapable of parsing it in an unbiased fashion. For him, any deviation from standard procedure falls loudly, squarely, and justly into the "we did it this way in the holy name of transparency and fairness" narrative that they crafted.