Hey mate, I'm doing nothing but drinking beer and eating pringles right now so I took the time to proofread your post. I didn't change the content, just fixed errors and made it more readable. Feel free to ignore it.
That is what I get for writing an article at 5 am before work.
Why is it always the "Flying Spaghetti Monster" that plays the role of the option for a belief system outside of the major deities? Anyways, all of this persons writings are akin to this one. I was only brought here via "chatter." Thanks a lot maxwell :)
Well written but disguised as discourse. It never lives up to its actual premise: >Even if you take the idea of God out of the equation it is impossible to rectify that we just become dust once again. You don't even come close to answering this question which is the lynch pin of any argument for or against an afterlife. Plenty of things in the Universe go through complex transformations (entropy) only to end as dust. You need to look at why we would be the exception to find clues to an afterlife (if even worrisome in this Universe at all).