a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by mk
mk  ·  4667 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Debunking the Bunk
I feel like you didn't read my comment.

I can see the benefit of a low capital gains targeting seniors or other middle income Americans. We could reinstate a marginal rate for capital gains similar to most of the rest of last century. Are you aware of what the marginal rates were?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MarginalIncomeTax.svg

A very basic example of a fairer capital gains code, would be for earnings over 1M, it is taxed as normal income.

Look, I do brain tumor research. I went to school for 20+ years to do it. I work to develop cures and treatments for a very deadly disease. If you are very savvy, you might get me to buy in on a philosophical level how someone like Warren Buffett or Mitt Romney does something commensurable to pay at a level of 1000x or 200x mine. But, you will never get me to agree that they should be taxed at half the rate. That's not a worldview I will buy.

Tax rates shouldn't decrease as earnings do. Being wealthy is a pretty good reward, no need for a regressive tax rate.





hootsbox  ·  4662 days ago  ·  link  ·  
As I have stated prior, I am more of a flat taxer and favor dumping the current tax code with all its finagling and changes to reward political supporters, lobbyists, and "friends". This currently applies and has applied to ALL POLITICAL PARTIES, and we should elect people who will actually make changes in the tax code. However, we still disagree on the progressive taxation issue which does, factually and historically, have its roots in Marxism (which I completely reject). To say to a person, who creates thousands and millions of jobs and creates employment opportunities for those folks to move from lower all the way to upper class, that you should be penalized for taking the effort, putting your capital at risk (they don't always work out and nobody wants to hold "protests in the park" to get them reimbursed even if they lose everything!), sacrificing time to build that enterprise, that we should now take the choice to "share or contribute to charities of choice" (understanding not everyone has the heart to do so, but I bet you and I would!) and force them to pay for others (who don't do the same things and never would because they are just not "motivated" to do so) is just not the right thing to do - IMHO! Good Day!