a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by Rossignol
Rossignol  ·  3743 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: What has moving to a new place done for you?

I'm not old enough to have been an active agent in any of my moves. You're not going to see my confessions here unless I'm being paid by the word, but the bottom line is I've seen three major moves and several smaller changes of scenery. There's now the prospect of moving to university. Naturally I'm not the one making the call on my own acceptance but I can at least choose where I might want to go.

Assuming you're asking for advice on your situation: I think the first thing that needs to be established is that moving will change your life. You've acknowledged that. Other people's posts are evidence. This:

    Turns out that lots of places want to hire me for professions I've left behind because I didn't feel like they would take me places, but that is turning out not to be true. I've also been re-cementing friendships via creative outlets.

shows that you're not relinquishing control over your own life. That's good. My most recent move was 5 years ago when I was 12 and thus fell at the beginning of what I'd consider particularly formative years. I can't quite fathom how backpacking around Vietnam brought you closer to spiritual oneness. I can, however, appreciate that some circumstances will offer you opportunity and that the onus is on you to take it. I was disappointed with where I'd moved to — it was a proprietary downsizing, and that can be taken symbolically. The objective minimisation of what I could do (fewer jobs here, worse schooling, fewer friendships, etc.) led to a perceptual minimisation. It's only now — and possibly in light of the fact that there is more personal freedom coming my way — that I'm starting to do something with where I've moved to and the people I've met.

Firstly, nothing I'm doing in this year is going to be lasting, this is more of a stepping stone. I don't like where I'm living; there's not enough here for it to be more than a stepping stone. Nonetheless, I'm happy that I'm using it for a — any purpose — purpose and I wish I'd started sooner.

Your second question is nullified in my instance. I didn't do anything in the moving process and I didn't do anything once the moving was over. In the future, I hope to move into the city. I see the stupidity in my self-fulfilling prophecy of minimisation. I think moving to a city would only foster my rejection of that error.

I couldn't locate Boston on a map and even less do I know what it's really like but I can imagine you're going to feel your life accelerate a bit. There's going to be a lot to take in. You'll even have to familiarise yourself with such minutiae as the commute to work. I think that's good. I don't know the context of your "not having time" discussion, but it may seem that there is a lot of commotion around your tidy plan. You shouldn't let it infect though. You have plenty of time but do not waste it. Arrive and observe your situation and move on from there. You've implied that you're now seeing the possibility of progression in several careers and you're going to choose from those too. There are plenty of factors that decide which job you're going to wind up in. It might be a simple income comparison, or how passionate you are about the work, or whether you're buddy-buddy enough with the boss to bed for a promotion — the point is that it's all just strategy. Map out where you are and where you're going.

While conjecture is a sweet solace, I can't just do it all again and neither can you. That's implied by the very usage of the conditional could — so don't waste time. Cynical inaction is a habit for those with too much life left or those with very little.





humanodon  ·  3743 days ago  ·  link  ·  

You assume that I was "backpacking around Vietnam" (among many other things). If living in a place for five years and thriving in the business culture of the place is considered "backpacking" then I guess I'm not hip to the lingo you kids are using.

I see that you are familiar with galen. There's a young guy who I think is approaching other users in a way that invites conversation and invites others to become interested in interacting with him. You are not.

Rossignol  ·  3743 days ago  ·  link  ·  

The backpacking around Vietnam sentence was sarcasm. I can understand that my sense of humour is caustic, but I didn't mean to cause offence. Sorry and I hope you see something else in my reply.

If you think that my comments don't apply to your situation, then I invite discussion. Please don't be put off.

humanodon  ·  3743 days ago  ·  link  ·  

If you stick around hubski, I think you'll see that I'm a pretty jocular guy. That said, it is often difficult to tell when people are being sarcastic in text, especially if it's someone one has never encountered before. I do appreciate the apology.

The way that I am talking to you about this is much milder than how some users on the site might handle it if someone responded to one of their posts with as much apparent patronizing condescension as you did to mine. You seem fairly intelligent (or at least you have a well-developed vocabulary/understanding of how to use a thesaurus) and to have knowledge about certain things, but I would urge you not to be a dick on the internet. The internet is full of internet forums filled with dicks and the reason I like hubski is because it's not. Hubski is full of people and because of that, I expect to interact with users with the same respect that we might offer each other in real life, particularly when meeting for the first time.

Now that that's out of the way, this year will be a stepping stone year for me too, but that's fine. Change is good and I'm doing what I can to be ready for it.

galen  ·  3743 days ago  ·  link  ·  

    I see that you are familiar with galen. There's a young guy who I think is approaching other users in a way that invites conversation and invites others to become interested in interacting with him.

Thanks, man. Really means a lot.

(I know it's hard to detect tone through pure text but this is entirely un-sarcastic)