I suck HARD at arithmetic. Like, massively hard. If I can do it in my head, I get it right. If it's one of those things where i have to show my work, I blow it. Yet I have an engineering degree with post-graduate work in acoustics and biomechanics. I did more calculus and differential equations as an acoustical consultant than any other graduate I knew. "math" is the stuff you can't do with a calculator. The shit you can do with a calculator? That's just number crunching. We invented abaci and trig tables and slide rules and calculators and computers and Siri to deal with that shit. All you need to know is if the answer looks right. The trick to learning "math" is to make it through to Calculus. Calculus is pretty much where the mathematicians say "okay, enough of these bullshit numbers. Let's dance." Calculus is where you start to learn exactly how the world works and everything opens up like The Matrix. If you keep going things get aggro. I once had a 2-hour final that started with "imagine a function", had 3 problems on it, and the only number on the page was "1" (the problems were lettered a, b and c). I suck at arithmetic. My wife rules at it. Incidentally, she graduated Magna Cum Laude with a bachelor's in Math. And we see the world in remarkably similar terms.
Its interesting to see some math papers written before high power computers were available readily. At the time, numerical solutions were all calculated by hand, so you'll see a hand drawn graph with just enough points filled in that the reader gets the picture. I think that's one of the ways computers have helped in teaching math; they've made it easy for students to visualize what a given function means. The down side, of course, being that they've become a huge crutch in place of real learning.
Hah. I can beat the shit out of that. I learned to build cars long before learning engineering. By the time I took my courses on steel I'd been welding for about six years (and taught the welding section of my class - because apparently, it's gauche for engineering professors to know how to weld). And I was getting my ass kicked by Mohr's Circle and psychometric charts and all these rootin' tootin' high falootin' engineering calcs and then we got to 495, capstone engineering, and you learn that a) to do real engineering work, you take the answer that you think is correct and you stack six "bullshit factor" coefficients in front of it to get your real answer b) more likely than not you skip those "bullshit factor" coefficients and just go with 1.6 for military hardware, 2 for racing, and between 5 and 10 for consumer gear and even then, the most successful designs are those that "look strong enough." I've pulled engines with seat belts - they work really goddamn well. Meanwhile, we had an engineering homework question where we were supposed to use our "FS=2" bullshit factor, our "FS=1.6" bullshit factor and our "FS=5" bullshit factor to determine how thick the chain on a playground swingset needed to be to support a drunken, overweight frat rat of 250 lbs. You won't be surprised to find out that playground swingsets are actually sized such that they can support a drunken, overweight Buick LeSabre. I decided I hated engineering when my Finite Element Analysis instructor docked us points if our answers weren't "heavy" enough (these were printouts from a server-based FORTRAN program and if your report didn't tip the scales at half a pound of paper, you didn't do enough work - something that would have been nice to have known before I imported it all into excel and truncated the last half of all my data tables because you know what? I like trees). Then I decided I loved engineering when I learned what dimensional analysis was.
That said, safety factors can be important, mainly because material defects exist so often. Its easier to over-design by a factor of 2-10 than it is to perform quality inspections constantly (not to mention the whole lawsuit protection game).
The amazing thing to me wasn't that mine was far and away the cheapest approach, but that mine was the only successful approach. Here's all these 4th-year engineering students, and exactly two of them are capable of building a fucking hoist.
The thing is, I don't know if I'm good at "math" or not because I've never really tried my hand at it. I avoided math classes in college and only got as far as Algebra 2 in HS. I was afraid of it as a kid because I would easily fall behind in class and it's a lot easier to say, "I quit" than it is "hey, I need help" when you're 15. Along with learning to speak french and learning to read music, I suppose I should add ditch your fear of math and take an adult ed class to my list of things to get done. By the way, your wife sounds pretty damned fascinating.
As for Khan Academy, it's been a while since my last math exercise. I got as for as Multiplication 4, then stopped. I've always been "bad at math", but was also fascinated by it. I think Khan Academy is a good place to learn. Sal is a good teacher and I really felt like I was cleaning a dusty room in my brain. I quit trying to learn physics, math and chemistry in my final high school year, so I'm probably as "bad in math" as you can get.
Quite. http://www.reddit.com/r/scifi/comments/dzdd3/we_went_oldscho...
We took some publicity photos this morning (new lobby cards). I kinda played up the wrinkles and gray hair... most people can't believe she's over 30. She's probably the only naturopathic doctor in the United States that was management at a multinational insurance company for a decade.
Now here's a lady I'd pay good money to freeze a placenta: http://i.imgur.com/Io1u1.jpg
"The trick to learning "math" is to make it through to Calculus. Calculus is pretty much where the mathematicians say "okay, enough of these bullshit numbers. Let's dance." Calculus is where you start to learn exactly how the world works and everything opens up like The Matrix." This was the experience I had as well. It may sound cliche but a whole new world opened up before me. A new understanding.