Every once in a while a government functionary slips up and inadvertently lets out the truth about how things work, in tones so frank it leaves us shaking our heads and wondering if we really heard correctly. That’s what happened when Blake Ewing, an Austin area assistant DA, expressed his true feelings (“Breaking Bad Normalizes Meth Use, Argues Prosecutor,” Time, September 20) about the TV drama Breaking Bad. The problem, he says, is not that Breaking Bad glorifies or romanticizes meth use. It’s that — as his title suggests — it “does normalize meth for a broad segment of society that might otherwise have no knowledge of that dark and dangerous world.”
“Before Breaking Bad, relatively few people knew someone whose life had been touched by meth, but now millions more people have an intense emotional connection with at least two: Walter White and Jesse Pinkman. And suddenly, for those spellbound viewers, the idea of people using meth is a little less foreign, a little more familiar. And that false sense of familiarity is inherently dangerous.”
And this is dangerous, Ewing makes clear, mainly from the perspective of the Drug War and his friends in the law enforcement community who fight it: “Law-enforcement officers’ duties bring them into contact with the drug-addled on a daily basis, so the proliferation of dangerous drugs directly affects their lives and families more than it might affect yours or mine.”
So there you have it. The very fact that a broad segment of the public has greater knowledge of an aspect of life about which they were previously ignorant makes it harder for the state to carry out its functions. Before, when almost nobody had any direct emotional connection with anybody who used meth, they depended mainly on the state’s Drug War propaganda for whatever, ahem, “knowledge” of the subject they possessed. So long as people who used drugs were a vague, menacing Other whom they’d never met in person, it was easy to mold their view of the world with crude propaganda of the Reefer Madness type, or smarmy PSAs (“Did You Know …”) from the White House Office of Drug Control Policy. If the state thinks you need to know any more than that, in order to serve its own purposes, it will tell you what you need to know — when it gets good and ready.
So long as the public perception of the shadowy Drug War enemy was shaped by state propaganda — breathless local TV news reporters covering heroic meth lab busts, the “thin blue line,” etc. — it could scare the public into supporting police militarization and the erosion of civil liberties. After all, the police are our friends — all that military equipment, all those warrantless searches, are to be used against … THEM.
The last thing the state wants is for the enemy to have a human face. The Western Allies’ High Command had a similar reaction to the Christmas Truce of 1914, when French, British and German troops suspended hostilities in northern France entirely on their own intiative, visited each other’s campfires, exchanged gifts or bartered goods, and played football in No Man’s Land. The British and French leadership didn’t like their grunts finding out that those baby-killing Huns were just a bunch of dumb grunts like them who believed the crap their government told them and went where they were ordered — and vice versa.
The state’s power depends on keeping you ignorant, on controlling your perceptions of the world, on making you fear the enemies it wants you to fear. But it’s the state itself, and the classes that control it, that are your enemies. Free your mind!
That's the heart of the issue. Meth is not a good thing. Ever. Even the most experienced drug experimenters and users can get sucked into the paranoid, delusional world of meth. You don't sleep. You don't function. A fun night consists of peeking out the blinds and watching cars go by. And usually it turns into day pretty quickly. You can't sleep. People tell you you can't sleep on coke but you can. Meth sleep is like laying in bed listening to the earth, never actually falling asleep. It'll change your brain to think shadow people exist. That people are around you and know your insides. They live in the trees and are watching you. You will contemplate or actually steal things. Sometimes for more money to buy more or sometimes just because you want the money. It shifts your relationships, values and self identity. And it'll all happen quicker than it takes for you to realize it's happened. It's scary. I'm all for people trying drugs with education but even this one...stay away. Nothing good will come of it.And suddenly, for those spellbound viewers, the idea of people using meth is a little less foreign, a little more familiar. And that false sense of familiarity is inherently dangerous.”
I mentioned this before, but the one person I have known that was really into meth was a girl in college. Her name was Kate, we called her "Hot Kate". After maybe six months to a year of regular meth use she was no longer Hot Kate but "Scary Kate". It's a dangerous drug and I do think Breaking Bad hasn't done enough to show how quickly it can screw someone up. The show doesn't glorify drug dealers though, in fact they're portrayed as being pretty despicable people. If anything the DEA agent Hank seems like one of the more "normal" characters on the show. -sort of. Great show. Edit: Also, I don't disagree that the state is at its most powerful when the citizenry is ignorant and disenfranchised. But, I do fail to see how a show like Breaking Bad has lifted any sort of societal veils.
The show has (I think deliberately) shown very little about the use/abuse of meth. I agree with most of what you say here, but I don't agree that "Breaking Bad hasn't done enough..." They produce entertainment; the show would be lessened, cheapened if you will, if they injected anti-use messages. I'm pretty sure TV shows in the USA can get some kick-backs for inserting "drugs are bad" messages, but they don't seem to be focused on that at all in BB, except when it's important for the story (i.e. Pinkman's relapse).
I definitely agree that BB should always serve the story first and not some agenda to educate people on the horrors of drugs. Still, Most of the meth users in the show just look like they're a bit tired after partying super hard. They're rarely toothless and pencil thin, aged well beyond their years. Except the one prostitute character, but then she was a crack head, right? Anyways, I agree -serve the story. They do this very well.
As, I suspect, meth users ARE in real life. Not every meth user turns in to a candidate for "faces of meth". I know a guy who has told me he meth-binges (for weeks at a time sometimes), but only once in a while. Looks perfectly healthy.Most of the meth users in the show just look like they're a bit tired after partying super hard. They're rarely toothless and pencil thin, aged well beyond their years.
That's fair. When you have a sample of one, it's not exactly a good window in to the effects of something.