Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
It's a bit disconcerting to me that future decisions on the functionality of Hubski are informed by how to deal with people like tarekzombie. I've seen this dude come up in many conversations recently and they're all about how to ignore him in as many ways as possible. If you check out his page and look through the history of his postings, you'll notice that there has not been one single share or comment - except for one. I commented on his very first post because, even on his first day on the site, he appeared to be a potential spammer and I wanted to at least engage him. Well that went nowhere and I can't say I appreciate it. At what point can you safely say, well there's 100 people ignoring this dude, maybe the Hubski community would be better off without this person? It's a challenging question, and I understand that Hubski doesn't want to start policing the site this way. I guess it comes down to this one question:
Is there a minimum standard the members of Hubski be held to?