I agree with you for the most part, though I think where we might differ would be about here . . . One of the things I think we sell short is, just how incredibly well designed some of the websites and programs are designed to keep us hooked on them. Facebook, World of Warcraft, Reddit, just to name a few. Like bars and casinos, retail outlets, etc., these places design themselves to benefit from the vulnerabilities we have in our way of thinking and reinforce behavior that benefits these types of business, even if these same behaviors are detrimental to us as individuals.. Some people are more resistant than others, just like not everyone will have problems with substance abuse in their lives, but for those that do it's a very real problem. While I think discipline is great, education is great, moderation is great, we need to recognize two things. One, for some people, abstinence is the easiest route and that that's an okay decision for them to make. If they think the benefits of total abstinence outweighs the benefits of using a device or service, that's their choice. Besides, they might be right. By not having to worry about a problem at all, they free themselves to focus on more important things in life, such as jobs and families and personal growth. More importantly though, at least in America, there is an underlying social thread of characterizing people who suffer from problems of addiction, whether it's substance addiction, gambling addiction, what have you, as being due to moral and spiritual failings. This creates a stigmatization where people become reluctant to admit they have a problem, public discourse about these types of problems are unfairly tilted, etc., and as a result, creates personal and social barriers that potentially prevent people from addressing and resolving the problems they face. While I'm not trying to say that Internet or Smartphone Addiction is anywhere near as severe as something like Opioid addiction, I still think it's important to discuss the issue and how it affects people in a balanced way.Granted, the apps have been purposely designed to exploit weaknesses in the human condition, as we've seen exposed in various articles over the last year or so. But those problems are still the person's. And with education, awareness, and discipline they can be overcome.
Total abstinence from a negative influence is definitely better than no action at all and I didn't meant to imply otherwise. Regardless of what other approaches there are, it is nonetheless a positive choice to make. I agree that abstinence is the easiest route. It is almost the most immediately beneficial. But my point was that, in this case, the harder route is even more beneficial to the person in the long run. Because they not only get to grow as person and reclaim their lives, but they also get to utilise all the beneficial things having a smartphone can enable. And I don't understand why people wouldn't want to aspire to grow and conquer themselves this way versus taking the easiest route of total abstinence. As such, I think it's that sort of attitude these sorts of articles should be more often promoting. Though I do acknowledge that a period of abstinence can be stepping stone towards this approach. On the other hand, after reading some more articles on the issues, I can see that I undersold the power these mechanisms can hold over people. I guess I speak from a position of privileged in that these things have never seemed to have as much grip over me as the authors of these articles say it does for them. So what seems like hard but achievable ideal for me, may for them be mountain whose peak is out of view. So yes, at the end of the day, any action that removes negative influence from a person's life is worth promoting.One, for some people, abstinence is the easiest route and that that's an okay decision for them to make.