No. It's about manufacturing and production of real goods. WWII Germany had wealth, and they actually had manufacturing. What they ran out of was resources. They couldn't manufacture, because they didn't have raw materials. In a war, gold can't buy the weapons you need from your enemy, and paper money certainly can't. Nor can money buy you anything In a global recession. When production of tangible goods fails, money becomes worthless. You can't eat gold. Wealth only exists when it's convenient for both parties. Read up on the Weimar Republic. When it couldn't pay its debt repayments, France invaded, workers striked, and production stopped. In response, the government printed money, which caused hyperinflation. The US stepped in, loaned them money (still think bailouts don't work?), and instated reasonable debt payments. Manufacturing production resumed, hyperinflation stopped, and the German economy stabilised until 1930 (when the shockwave of the US Great Depression hit). Services aren't production. Sure, services have value. We could theoretically "export" say, programmers, and they certainly add to our ability to produce. But tangible goods exist and persist. Services don't. Most of the so-called "service industry" is luxury anyway. Fast food workers? Cashiers? Masseuses? Those don't add value, beyond frivolous luxury which evaporates in crisis. The valuable services we have – construction workers, engineers, electricians – are a small minority. Look at any third-world country. Mali has fifteen million people who could be trivially trained to provide services. The country is in abject poverty because it lacks resources, and it lacks manufacturing. I repeat: service-sector economies are a geriatric illusion. Consider India. I'm a software engineer. India is trying to export services, of tech workers. I've yet to meet or hear of anyone successfully contracting Indian programmers. What I have heard, are countless horror stories of wasted time and money. There are some brilliant Indian programmers out there. I've met some of them. The problem is you can't find them in the vast sea of incompetents. Exporting services might be possible, but India is currently a huge, failing counterexample. Completely theoretical, and completely wrong. Depressions and recessions are bad, in practice. Yeah, theory tells me I ought to be able to buy more stuff because my money is worth more. In practice, I can't, because I don't have a job, because my employer fired me because his profits were down. Further, my mortgage didn't change, so with the deflation suddenly I owe effectively twice my previous house payment. Which I can't make, so I lose my house. Et cetera. You can make up any theory you like, but at the end of the day, deflation is bad in practice. Incidentally, right before the Weimar Republic's hyperinflation there was a brief period of deflation.It's not about power, it's about wealth.
the key is production. For example services aren't exactly manufactured.
"deflation" basically boils down to an increase in purchasing power, and is therefore a good thing,
We seem to be working with different definitions for "wealth". I meant wealth in the sense of goods, products, services, buildings, infrastructure, plumbing.. basically everything that's available to you and serves or supports your goals somehow. It seems you may have interpreted "wealth" as roughly the same as "money". I didn't say services are production, but that they are produced (and serve as "wealth"). Yes, they have value. There are services related to manufacturing too. But you could argue that even a service like a massage has productive value if it enables you to be more productive. If a country is in abject poverty, it's fundamentally because its rulers have looted and pillaged the people too hard. It's really simple: The freer people are to produce wealth, the more wealth gets produced. Of course, people need to rest assured that they'll get to enjoy the fruits of their labour too, because otherwise they wouldn't bother with producing. For example, if you're starting a business in Russia, be prepared for the state to just confiscate it if it gets profitable enough. Strangely enough, Russia is a shithole. What were you getting at with that paragraph though? I was just talking about an increase in purchasing power being a good thing. That is very much accurate by itself. You mixed that up with other issues that are unclear. If you want to start from a set of premises and reason through things, feel free to present a scenario, but you'll find that problems in economies are always ultimately caused by political power.No. It's about manufacturing and production of real goods. WWII Germany had wealth, and they actually had manufacturing. What they ran out of was resources. They couldn't manufacture, because they didn't have raw materials. In a war, gold can't buy the weapons you need from your enemy, and paper money certainly can't. Nor can money buy you anything In a global recession. When production of tangible goods fails, money becomes worthless. You can't eat gold.
Services aren't production. Sure, services have value.
But tangible goods exist and persist. Services don't. Most of the so-called "service industry" is luxury anyway. Fast food workers? Cashiers? Masseuses?
Mali has fifteen million people who could be trivially trained to provide services. The country is in abject poverty because it lacks resources, and it lacks manufacturing.
Exporting services might be possible, but India is currently a huge, failing counterexample.
Completely theoretical, and completely wrong. Depressions and recessions are bad, in practice.