> write a brief argument about why people should care about ChatGPT, especially its broader implications on the work force
There are several reasons why people should care about ChatGPT and its broader implications on the work force.
First, ChatGPT is a powerful and versatile language model that has the potential to revolutionize the way we interact with technology. By allowing people to communicate with computers in a more natural and intuitive way, ChatGPT has the potential to make a wide range of tasks easier and more efficient.
Second, ChatGPT has the potential to impact the work force in a number of ways. For example, it could be used to automate certain tasks that are currently performed by humans, such as customer service and data entry. This could lead to increased productivity and efficiency, as well as freeing up workers to focus on more creative and rewarding tasks.
Third, the development of ChatGPT and other similar technologies also has broader implications for the economy and society as a whole. As artificial intelligence continues to advance, it will be important for workers to adapt and develop new skills to stay competitive in the job market. This will require investments in education and training, as well as a willingness to embrace new technologies and ways of working.
Overall, ChatGPT and its broader implications on the work force are important to consider because they have the potential to greatly impact the way we live and work.
---
On the one hand: everything I've thrown at ChatGPT has been a thousand times more impressive than the parroting models of yore. Right now, automated news / wikipedia article creation is already a thing - it's not hard to see that expanded to everything from birthday cards to opinion pieces to consultancy reports to copywriters. It's also not hard to see the malevolent uses on the rise: imagine a social media that's 80% propaganda bots powered by AI language models? This whole AI boom has been going on for only a few months. It's going to get better.
On the other hand, unless you're a level 99 prompt warlock the results are (and will always be?) quite generic, the common denominator. Its confidence will always be brazen even when saying things that are plain untrue. Neither of those drawbacks are easy to train for or solved with moar data.