On my youtube recommended list, I found a deposition of Bill Gates from the Microsoft antitrust lawsuit of 1998-2000. It was labeled comedy. :p
Here's some information in a NY Times article on the case.
Out of curiosity, I watched it and became engrossed. It was like watching a game of cat and mouse with the attorneys and Bill Gates.
When I went to look at the outcome of the case, I read a few articles written a decade later that brought up the issue that in hindsight, the case wasn't really necessary. The monopoly that Microsoft had supposedly started would have been broken up by the change in technology from desktops to mobiles, and other innovations in technology that made the difference in the hold that Microsoft had on the competition. The lawsuit wasn't necessary.
That has implications for future cases of monopoly by technology companies.
In the future, should the government get involved in monopoly cases of technology companies or just allow companies to innovate around the monopoly? Was the Microsoft lawsuit necessary?