I don't think it'll surprise you that I disagree that it's an avoidance of the question. I find it more that the basic underpinning of the question is a misunderstanding. Technology has been enabling a much greater capacity for human interaction. I mean, we are talking over the Internet right now, right? We'd never have this discussion without the technology. What the Glass project is doing, I think, is a refinement - the technology is an improvement on our last iteration. It isn't "we did something wrong and we need to fix it" - rather, it's "we've done something right, but we are improving it." The home computer and Internet allowed some additional interaction but it was flawed - we couldn't take it with us in our day-to-day lives. Next, the cellphone and then Smartphone has enabled us to communicate with anyone at will, but the downside is having to remove your gaze from the rest of the world. Now we are at the brink of having all the benefits of the smartphone - tools, accessibility, communication, and learning - in a package that doesn't require us to be removed from the rest of the world. Personally, I'm very excited. I won't be a day 1 adopter but I certainly will be following this thing very closely.