Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
it's an interesting set of abstractions but haidt seems like a really good example of a "thought daddy"-type guy - the first conclusion (humans feel before thinking) is a good point but the other two points feel like philosophy masking itself as science philosophical explanations are fine but the attempt to pass them off as a universal scientific Truth rubs me the wrong way apologies to shit in your stew - i know you didn't ask for my opinion on anything so please ignore it if you don't want it