I ain't gonna ask you shit I'ma make you feel bad, dawg.

The architects I know have been up in arms about this shit for the better part of a year. They're right.

1) Classicist architecture costs more than normal architecture and budgets aren't going to go anywhere. So what you'll end up with is Doric columns instead of air conditioning, but since air conditioning is part of the building code and Doric columns are part of the executive order, the building won't get built.

2) Neoclassicism is tied to the ideal of ruin value, a concept introduced by Albert Speer to make the Third Reich look imposing for the 1933 Olympics. It continued to be the principle aesthetic of genocide throughout Hitler's reign such that Nazi architecture was demolished rather than re-used.

3) But then, "imposing architecture" has been the standard of empire going back to Khufu or before. In general, the more despotic a regime the more their buildings lean into classicism. Turkmenistan before totalitarianism:

Turkmenistan during totalitarianism:

You will get no argument from me that current trends in architecture are pure shit. But telling current architects "build for the future of The Reich" is not a guideline that should be celebrated by you or anyone else.