Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
That has interesting implications for future valuation of specific timepieces. "Previously owned by Prince William" can now be authenticated without a doubt. As can "previously owned by Ted Bundy". While provenance has always been a consideration in the valuation of an antique or historical item, it's generally taken with a pretty large grain of salt, unless there is - for example - a photo of the individual wearing the item. This gives absolute proof of ownership. (Although, I expect what exactly "ownership" means will come into question at some point as well. "Sure, it was bought by MBS, but worn by Queen Noor," or whatever.)