I remember a couple years ago listening to a round-table discussion on NPR where a guest offhandedly said that Fox was not a news organization. Immediately, the host was like: "Whoa whoa whoa! We don't say things like that!" (It's almost like using the term liar to describe a politician. Third rail stuff.) But, IMO it's close to the truth. By my definition, Fox, CNN and MSNBC are "newsertainment" organizations. Not news organizations. HuffPo is the same. It just might be that for-profit news cannot be quality in this day and age. Personally, I think a quality for-profit news organization could work, but only if they cater to a smaller select audience. Unfortunately, if the organization is publicly traded, it won't take long until a CEO ruins it for more money.