Thank you, although I understand my articles can be somewhat misleading, all my stories exist in greater context of previous articles, and the need for system change. But for that you would need to read all previous articles, and slowly you would get where I am heading.

Although I think for myself that I have scientific mind I do not like rigid approach, nether I have dismissed the possibility about discussion about those subject, I am pro lateral thinking in relax and creative environment. Militant atheist or religious environment where only goal is to ridicule other side because of their belief I do not grasp as helpful, and also I am afraid that similar approach does not solve problems but rather create more of them.

I will write in future about that, how often we argue about something we either do not have any knowledge, or we argue because "someone" has offered us a limited number of choices, and we convinced ourselves that what is offered is the only thing that is.

Like when you were a little kid and all you could see on TV were Mars or Snickers bars advertisement, and you will start arguing, with your similarly aged 6-7 years old friend from the next door, what chocolate bar is better, and then argument will heat up, you will start calling him names, and saying no I am right you do not know anything, maybe you will even fight with him. Until one day, your dad takes you to the near supermarket and you realize that there are hundreds of different chocolate bars, then at the same time you feel overwhelmed, sad and ashamed because you were fighting with your friend about something that is not important, and what really is important you have endangered with that silly fight.