Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
I would agree that it's a question of choice. The example that comes to mind is a soldier in the battlefield: should he use his gun to kill his enemies, advance his position and protect himself or not? I would suggest, though, that the choice isn't implied in the technology. That is to say, even though a gun is a machine built for destruction, there's a choice in using or not using it for that purpose. In other words, there might be some conditioning factors outside the technology that influence the way it is used.
So I would agree with you that, yes, in a general sense, it is true, but misleading. But I would argue that the misleading is not in the actual technology itself, but in the circumstances of its usage.