If this is graduate-level shit stirring, then I don't know what the rest of the conversation we had would be categorized as. That's gotta be some like....post-death post-grad work or something. :P I take your point though and I apologize. I assure you that it wasn't done to intentionally stir shit. Also, for the record, I've included most (if not all) of the Hubski meta-dramas in the newsletters simply because they tend to spark some real discussions. I always go back and forth like 10 times before finally including it. Maybe after the holidays I'll do a poll newsletter to see who is reading them. It would be helpful to know if 90% of the audience are everyday Hubskiers or occasional Hubskiers or almost-never Hubskiers. If 90% are everyday Hubskiers, I would probably try to find those hidden gems people might have missed, whereas the occasional Hubskiers probably just want all the top posts that they would have seen if they had been on Hubski.