Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
Excellent read. I'm sorry if my next question pains you (because I believe it stems from my lack of comprehension rather than your ability to explain yourself). How does your philosophical position relate to stability and reciprocity? I understand the argument that normative moral systems have an implicit requirement for both stability and reciprocity (no matter how unequal) but I didn't quite understand how that related to your position. From my understanding because your philosophy is not a normative philosophy stability and reciprocity don't play a big role or possibly no role at all. Is that correct?